Literature DB >> 1839716

Pain intensity measurement in chronic low back pain.

J Strong1, R Ashton, D Chant.   

Abstract

This study investigated the psychometric properties of eight pain intensity measures used with chronic low back pain patients. All measures were similar in terms of scale distribution and rates of incorrect responses, with all scales apart from the Pain Rating Index significantly correlated. Principal axis factoring of data from 92 patients indicated the presence of one general factor on which all pain intensity measures except the Pain Rating Index loaded. The 101-point Numeric Rating Scale and the Box Scale had the strongest relationship, with loadings of 0.90. The Numeric Rating Scale and the Box Scale appear to be the scales of choice for the measurement of pain intensity in the low back pain patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1839716     DOI: 10.1097/00002508-199109000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Pain        ISSN: 0749-8047            Impact factor:   3.442


  25 in total

1.  The reliability and validity of a measure of perceived functional capacity for work in chronic back pain.

Authors:  L Gibson; J Strong
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1996-09

Review 2.  Psychological aspects of pain.

Authors:  R G Large
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Effects of recreational physical activity and back exercises on low back pain and psychological distress: findings from the UCLA Low Back Pain Study.

Authors:  Eric L Hurwitz; Hal Morgenstern; Chi Chiao
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  A clinical return-to-work rule for patients with back pain.

Authors:  Clermont E Dionne; Renée Bourbonnais; Pierre Frémont; Michel Rossignol; Susan R Stock; Isabelle Larocque
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Intravertebral clefts opacified during vertebroplasty: pathogenesis, technical implications, and prognostic significance.

Authors:  John I Lane; Timothy P Maus; John T Wald; Kent R Thielen; Shalabh Bobra; Patrick H Luetmer
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Racial and Ethnic Differences in Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 2001-2013.

Authors:  Leslie R M Hausmann; Cynthia A Brandt; Constance M Carroll; Brenda T Fenton; Said A Ibrahim; William C Becker; Diana J Burgess; Laura D Wandner; Matthew J Bair; Joseph L Goulet
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 4.794

7.  Determinants of "return to work in good health" among workers with back pain who consult in primary care settings: a 2-year prospective study.

Authors:  Clermont E Dionne; Renée Bourbonnais; Pierre Frémont; Michel Rossignol; Susan R Stock; Arie Nouwen; Isabelle Larocque; Eric Demers
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Dual Use of Department of Veterans Affairs and Medicare Benefits on High-Risk Opioid Prescriptions in Veterans Aged 65 Years and Older: Insights from the VA Musculoskeletal Disorders Cohort.

Authors:  Philip W Chui; Lori A Bastian; Eric DeRycke; Cynthia A Brandt; William C Becker; Joseph L Goulet
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Effectiveness of physical therapy and exercise on pain and functional status in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized-controlled trial.

Authors:  Nilay Şahin; Ali Yavuz Karahan; İlknur Albayrak
Journal:  Turk J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-08-09

10.  Adherence and characteristics of participants enrolled in a standardised programme of patient education and exercises for low back pain, GLA:D® Back - a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Inge Ris; Daniel Broholm; Jan Hartvigsen; Tonny Elmose Andersen; Alice Kongsted
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.