Literature DB >> 18396792

Review. 18F-FDG PET in the diagnosis and follow-up of thyroid malignancy.

A Al-Nahhas1, S Khan, A Gogbashian, E Banti, L Rampin, D Rubello.   

Abstract

The diagnosis of carcinoma of the thyroid is usually made in the process of investigating a thyroid nodule with clinical examination, Technetium-99m scan, ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology. The follow-up is mainly based on 123-iodine and 131-iodine scans and serum thyroglogulin measurement. The aim of the present review was to establish the role of 18F-FDG PET in the differential diagnosis of doubtful thyroid nodules and in the follow-up of patients with increased serum thyroglobulin levels and negative iodine-scan. It remains to be defined if metabolic imaging with PET could be a useful routine procedure in the management of thyroid tumours since the majority of them are well-differentiated and therefore have less avidity to 18F-FDG. In the present work we collected the specific literature derived from MEDLINE over the last 10 years to clarify the potential clinical value of 18F-FDG PET in thyroid malignancies. An emerging role for 18F-FDG PET is in the assessment of incidental finding of a thyroid nodule which, when showing high FDG uptake should be regarded as a possible malignancy that needs further assessment. Another well-documented role for 18F-FDG PET is in the investigation of cases of established well-differentiated thyroid carcinomas presenting with high thyroglobulin and negative iodine imaging. An increase of the 18F-FDG uptake in these tumours indicates a shift towards lesser differentiation (with more aggression and poor prognosis) and may benefit from alternative management. 18F-FDG PET can be considered a routine functional imaging method in detecting iodine-negative recurrent disease in thyroid cancer patients with elevated serum thyroglobulin levels during follow-up. 18F-FDG PET seems to be useful also in differential diagnosis of suspected thyroid nodules, especially using the semi-quantitative SUV analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18396792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  In Vivo        ISSN: 0258-851X            Impact factor:   2.155


  6 in total

1.  Differentiated thyroid cancer with liver metastases: lessons learned from managing a series of 14 patients.

Authors:  C Brient; S Mucci; D Taïeb; M Mathonnet; F Menegaux; E Mirallié; P Meyer; F Sebag; F Triponez; A Hamy
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-03

Review 2.  Novel Approaches to Thyroid Cancer Treatment and Response Assessment.

Authors:  Ravinder K Grewal; Alan Ho; Heiko Schöder
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.446

3.  Molecular imaging of potential bone metastasis from differentiated thyroid cancer: a case report.

Authors:  Nora Sandu; Gabriele Pöpperl; Marie-Elisabeth Toubert; Belachew Arasho; Toma Spiriev; Mikael Orabi; Bernhard J Schaller
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2011-10-23

4.  Clinical value of technetium-99m-labeled octreotide scintigraphy in local recurrent or metastatic medullary thyroid cancers: a comparison of lesions with 18F-FDG-PET and MIBI images.

Authors:  Sait Sager; Levent Kabasakal; Meltem Ocak; Helmut Maecke; Lebriz Uslu; Metin Halaç; Sertac Asa; Günes Sager; Çetin Önsel; Bedii Kanmaz
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.690

5.  The usefulness of standardized uptake value in differentiation between benign and malignant thyroid lesions detected incidentally in 18F-FDG PET/CT examination.

Authors:  Adam Stangierski; Kosma Woliński; Rafał Czepczyński; Agata Czarnywojtek; Martha Lodyga; Anna Wyszomirska; Małgorzata Janicka-Jedyńska; Maciej Bączyk; Marek Ruchała
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Thyroid incidentaloma as a "PAIN" phenomenon- does it always require surgery?

Authors:  Krzysztof Kaliszewski; Dorota Diakowska; Marcin Ziętek; Bartłomiej Knychalski; Michał Aporowicz; Krzysztof Sutkowski; Beata Wojtczak
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.