Literature DB >> 18396549

Soil quality assessment in rice production systems: establishing a minimum data set.

Ana Cláudia Rodrigues de Lima1, Willem Hoogmoed, Lijbert Brussaard.   

Abstract

Soil quality, as a measure of the soil's capacity to function, can be assessed by indicators based on physical, chemical, and biological properties. Here we report on the assessment of soil quality in 21 rice (Oryza sativa) fields under three rice production systems (semi-direct, pre-germinated, and conventional) on four soil textural classes in the Camaquã region of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The objectives of our study were: (i) to identify soil quality indicators that discriminate both management systems and soil textural classes, (ii) to establish a minimum data set of soil quality indicators and (iii) to test whether this minimum data set is correlated with yield. Twenty-nine soil biological, chemical, and physical properties were evaluated to characterize regional soil quality. Soil quality assessment was based on factor and discriminant analysis. Bulk density, available water, and micronutrients (Cu, Zn, and Mn) were the most powerful soil properties in distinguishing among different soil textural classes. Organic matter, earthworms, micronutrients (Cu and Mn), and mean weight diameter were the most powerful soil properties in assessing differences in soil quality among the rice management systems. Manganese was the property most strongly correlated with yield (adjusted r2 = 0.365, P = 0.001). The merits of sub-dividing samples according to texture and the linkage between soil quality indicators, soil functioning, plant performance, and soil management options are discussed in particular.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18396549     DOI: 10.2134/jeq2006.0280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Qual        ISSN: 0047-2425            Impact factor:   2.751


  6 in total

1.  Tillage, green manure and residue retention improves aggregate-associated phosphorus fractions under rice-wheat cropping.

Authors:  Sandeep Sharma; Sukhjinder Kaur; Om Parkash Choudhary; Manpreet Singh; Asma A Al-Huqail; Hayssam M Ali; Ritesh Kumar; Manzer H Siddiqui
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Assessment of soil quality for guided fertilization in 7 barley agro-ecological areas of China.

Authors:  Yu Zhou; Yingcheng Fan; Guang Lu; Anyong Zhang; Ting Zhao; Genlou Sun; Daokun Sun; Qi Yu; Xifeng Ren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  A review on effective soil health bio-indicators for ecosystem restoration and sustainability.

Authors:  Debarati Bhaduri; Debjani Sihi; Arnab Bhowmik; Bibhash C Verma; Sushmita Munda; Biswanath Dari
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 6.064

4.  Bacterial indicator of agricultural management for soil under no-till crop production.

Authors:  Eva L M Figuerola; Leandro D Guerrero; Silvina M Rosa; Leandro Simonetti; Matías E Duval; Juan A Galantini; José C Bedano; Luis G Wall; Leonardo Erijman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Soil Quality Indexing Strategies for Evaluating Sugarcane Expansion in Brazil.

Authors:  Maurício R Cherubin; Douglas L Karlen; Carlos E P Cerri; André L C Franco; Cássio A Tormena; Christian A Davies; Carlos C Cerri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Nutrient Use Efficiency of Southern South America Proteaceae Species. Are there General Patterns in the Proteaceae Family?

Authors:  Mabel Delgado; Susana Valle; Marjorie Reyes-Díaz; Patricio J Barra; Alejandra Zúñiga-Feest
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 5.753

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.