Literature DB >> 18395326

Comparable efficacy of once-daily versus on-demand vardenafil in men with mild-to-moderate erectile dysfunction: findings of the RESTORE study.

Jurgen Zumbé1, Hartmut Porst, Frank Sommer, Walter Grohmann, Manfred Beneke, Ernst Ulbrich.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Phosphodiesterase (type) 5 (PDE5) inhibitors are currently administered on demand for treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). Once-daily dosing has been suggested to benefit patients.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether daily vardenafil use provides added clinical benefits to patients compared with on-demand dosing. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicentre parallel-group study, men with mild-to-moderate ED were randomised to 24 wk of treatment, followed by a 4-wk washout. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomised to receive once-daily vardenafil 10mg plus on-demand placebo for 12 or 24 wk, or once-daily placebo plus on-demand vardenafil 10mg for 24 wk. MEASUREMENTS: Primary efficacy variable was the between-group difference in change in International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function domain (IIEF-EF) score from baseline to end of washout. Secondary variables included change from baseline in proportion of positive respondents to Sexual Encounter Profile questions and in satisfaction with treatment as assessed with the Treatment Satisfaction Scale (TSS). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: LS mean changes from baseline in IIEF-EF scores were 2.02, 2.29, and 2.63 for vardenafil 12 wk once daily, 24 wk once daily, and 24 wk on demand, respectively. After washout, the trend was towards improved IIEF-EF scores in the on-demand group (20.58 [+/-0.96]) versus both once-daily groups (12 wk, 19.88 [+/-0.93]; 24 wk, 20.11 [+/-0.94]). Furthermore, there were no significant between-group differences in the percentage of patients with "normal" erectile function. TSS analyses demonstrated no significant differences between treatment groups. This study recruited patients with mild-to-moderate ED; therefore, the results may not be the same as in patients with severe ED.
CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily vardenafil did not produce greater sustained effects on EF than on-demand vardenafil in men with mild-to-moderate ED, suggesting that daily dosing of PDE5 inhibitors does not produce sustained clinical benefits beyond cessation of treatment above those observed with on-demand administration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18395326     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.03.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  9 in total

1.  Penile rehabilitation following treatment for prostate cancer: an analysis of the current state of the art.

Authors:  Tariq Al Shaiji; Trustin Domes; Gerald Brock
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  [Conservative therapy of erectile dysfunction].

Authors:  M Trottmann; J Marcon; S Pompe; D Strobach; A J Becker; C G Stief
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  Vardenafil orodispersible tablet.

Authors:  Mark Sanford
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  [Chronic PDE-5 inhibition in patients with erectile dysfunction: new treatment approach using once daily Tadalafil].

Authors:  H Porst; K Hell-Momeni; H Büttner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Comparison of the efficacy and safety of once-daily dosing and on-demand use of udenafil for type 2 diabetic patients with erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Soon Hyun Park; Sung Woo Park; Bong Yun Cha; Ie Byung Park; Kyung Wan Min; Yeon Ah Sung; Tae Hwa Kim; Jae Min Lee; Kang Seo Park
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 6.  Clinical and preclinical treatment of urologic diseases with phosphodiesterase isoenzymes 5 inhibitors: an update.

Authors:  Wen-Hao Zhang; Xin-Hua Zhang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.285

7.  Chronic low dosing of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor for erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Hyun Hwan Sung; Sung Won Lee
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2012-06-19

Review 8.  Korean Society for Sexual Medicine and Andrology (KSSMA) Guideline on Erectile Dysfunction.

Authors:  Ji Kan Ryu; Kang Su Cho; Su Jin Kim; Kyung Jin Oh; Sung Chul Kam; Kyung Keun Seo; Hong Seok Shin; Soo Woong Kim
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 5.400

Review 9.  The devil is in the details: an analysis of the subtleties between phosphodiesterase inhibitors for erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  L I Smith-Harrison; Abhishek Patel; Ryan P Smith
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2016-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.