Literature DB >> 18394969

From user needs to system specifications: multi-disciplinary thematic seminars as a collaborative design method for development of health information systems.

I Scandurra1, M Hägglund, S Koch.   

Abstract

This paper presents a new multi-disciplinary method for user needs analysis and requirements specification in the context of health information systems based on established theories from the fields of participatory design and computer supported cooperative work (CSCW). Whereas conventional methods imply a separate, sequential needs analysis for each profession, the "multi-disciplinary thematic seminar" (MdTS) method uses a collaborative design process. Application of the method in elderly homecare resulted in prototypes that were well adapted to the intended user groups. Vital information in the points of intersection between different care professions was elicited and a holistic view of the entire care process was obtained. Health informatics-usability specialists and clinical domain experts are necessary to apply the method. Although user needs acquisition can be time-consuming, MdTS was perceived to efficiently identify in-context user needs, and transformed these directly into requirements specifications. Consequently the method was perceived to expedite the entire ICT implementation process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18394969     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.01.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Inform        ISSN: 1532-0464            Impact factor:   6.317


  9 in total

1.  Modeling shared care plans using CONTsys and openEHR to support shared homecare of the elderly.

Authors:  Maria Hägglund; Rong Chen; Sabine Koch
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  The patient handoff: a comprehensive curricular blueprint for resident education to improve continuity of care.

Authors:  Max V Wohlauer; Vineet M Arora; Leora I Horwitz; Ellen J Bass; Sean E Mahar; Ingrid Philibert
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  A Randomized Trial Comparing Classical Participatory Design to VandAID, an Interactive CrowdSourcing Platform to Facilitate User-centered Design.

Authors:  Kevin R Dufendach; Sabine Koch; Kim M Unertl; Christoph U Lehmann
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 2.176

4.  Leveraging health information exchange to improve population health reporting processes: lessons in using a collaborative-participatory design process.

Authors:  Debra Revere; Brian E Dixon; Rebecca Hills; Jennifer L Williams; Shaun J Grannis
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2014-10-22

5.  Sociotechnical Intervention for Improved Delivery of Preventive Cardiovascular Care to Rural Communities: Participatory Design Approach.

Authors:  Michelle Partogi; Simon Gaviria-Valencia; Mateo Alzate Aguirre; Nancy J Pick; Huzefa M Bhopalwala; Barbara A Barry; Vinod C Kaggal; Christopher G Scott; Maya E Kessler; Matthew M Moore; Jay D Mitchell; Rajeev Chaudhry; Robert P Bonacci; Adelaide M Arruda-Olson
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 7.076

Review 6.  Defining Data Migration Across Multidisciplinary Ambulatory Clinics Using Participatory Design.

Authors:  Brianne MacKenzie; Gabriel Anaya; Jinwei Hu; Arlen Brickman; Peter L Elkin; Mandip Panesar
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.342

7.  Participatory Design With Seniors: Design of Future Services and Iterative Refinements of Interactive eHealth Services for Old Citizens.

Authors:  Isabella Scandurra; Marie Sjölinder
Journal:  Med 2 0       Date:  2013-10-08

8.  Applying a Participatory Design Approach to Define Objectives and Properties of a "Data Profiling" Tool for Electronic Health Data.

Authors:  Hossein Estiri; Terri Lovins; Nader Afzalan; Kari A Stephens
Journal:  AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc       Date:  2016-07-20

9.  Internet-based self-management support for adults with asthma: a qualitative study among patients, general practitioners and practice nurses on barriers to implementation.

Authors:  Johanna L van Gaalen; Leti van Bodegom-Vos; Moira J Bakker; Jiska B Snoeck-Stroband; Jacob K Sont
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.