Literature DB >> 18394266

Comparison of the therapeutic effects of epoetin zeta and epoetin alpha in the correction of renal anaemia.

Stefan Krivoshiev1, Vasil V Todorov, Jacek Manitius, Stanislaw Czekalski, Paul Scigalla, Rossen Koytchev.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the therapeutic equivalence of epoetin zeta and epoetin alpha for correction of haemoglobin (Hb) concentration in patients with anaemia and chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 5 maintained on haemodialysis. STUDY
DESIGN: In total, 609 patients with CKD and anaemia (Hb < 9 g/dL) were randomly assigned to receive either epoetin zeta or epoetin alpha intravenously, one to three times per week for 24 weeks. Dosing was titrated individually to achieve a stable, target Hb concentration of 11-12 g/dL. Primary endpoints were the mean weekly dose of epoetin per kilogram of body weight and mean Hb concentration during the last 4 weeks of treatment. Safety endpoints were the occurrence of anti-erythropoietin antibodies, ratings of tolerability and adverse events (AEs).
RESULTS: Mean (+/- standard deviation [SD]) Hb concentration over the last 4 weeks of treatment was 11.61 +/- 1.27 g/dL for patients receiving epoetin zeta, compared with 11.63 +/- 1.37 g/dL for patients receiving epoetin alpha (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.25 to 0.20 g/dL). Mean (+/- SD) epoetin zeta weekly dose over the last 4 weeks of treatment was 182.20 +/- 118.11 IU/kg/wk, compared with 166.14 +/- 109.85 IU/kg/wk for epoetin alpha (95% CI: -3.21 to 35.34 IU/kg/wk). The most commonly reported AEs (> 5% of patients) were infections and infestations (12.5% and 12.8% of patients treated with epoetin zeta and epoetin alpha, respectively) and vascular disorders (8.5% and 8.9%, respectively). No patients developed neutralizing anti-erythropoietin antibodies.
CONCLUSIONS: Epoetin zeta, administered intravenously, is therapeutically equivalent to epoetin alpha in the correction of low Hb concentration in patients with CKD undergoing haemodialysis. No unexpected AEs were seen and both epoetin zeta and epoetin alpha were well tolerated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18394266     DOI: 10.1185/030079908x297402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  24 in total

1.  Effectiveness of Switch to Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent (ESA) Biosimilars versus Maintenance of ESA Originators in the Real-Life Setting: Matched-Control Study in Hemodialysis Patients.

Authors:  Roberto Minutolo; Piergiorgio Bolasco; Paolo Chiodini; Stefano Sposini; Maurizio Borzumati; Cataldo Abaterusso; Alessandra A Mele; Domenico Santoro; Valeria Canale; Alberto Santoboni; Oliviero Filiberti; Fulvio Fiorini; Carlo Mura; Patrizio Imperiali; Silvio Borrelli; Luigi Russo; Luca De Nicola; Domenico Russo
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.859

2.  Key concepts and critical issues on epoetin and filgrastim biosimilars. A position paper from the Italian Society of Hematology, Italian Society of Experimental Hematology, and Italian Group for Bone Marrow Transplantation.

Authors:  Giovanni Barosi; Alberto Bosi; Maria P Abbracchio; Romano Danesi; Armando Genazzani; Paolo Corradini; Fabrizio Pane; Sante Tura
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  Biosimilars Are Here: A Hospital Pharmacist's Guide to Educating Health Care Professionals on Biosimilars.

Authors:  Steven Jarrett; Theodor Dingermann
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2015-11-19

4.  Characterization and comparison of commercially available TNF receptor 2-Fc fusion protein products.

Authors:  Qingqiao Tan; Qingcheng Guo; Chen Fang; Chong Wang; Bohua Li; Hao Wang; Jing Li; Yajun Guo
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 5.857

5.  Between subjects variability in haemoglobin and dose are not associated with the erythropoiesis-stimulating agent used to treat anaemia in dialysis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Juan José Pérez-Ruixo; Mercedes Cucala-Ramos; Ester García-Gonzalo; Beatriz Del Val Romero; Neus Valveny
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  A population-based study comparing biosimilar versus originator erythropoiesis-stimulating agent consumption in 6,117 patients with renal anaemia.

Authors:  Franziska Hörbrand; Peter Bramlage; Johann Fischaleck; Joerg Hasford; Reinhard Brunkhorst
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  The approval process for biosimilar erythropoiesis-stimulating agents.

Authors:  Jay B Wish
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  Comparative risk/benefit profile of biosimilar and originator erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs): data from an Italian observational study in nephrology.

Authors:  Domenico Motola; Alberto Vaccheri; Andrea Roncadori; Monia Donati; Giulia Bonaldo; Anna Covezzoli; Piera Polidori; Stefano Bianchi
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 9.  Biosimilar erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and the risk of developing anti-drug antibodies-a systematic review.

Authors:  Marianne Heibert Arnlind; Linda Fryklund; Sigurd Vitols; Göran Bertilsson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 10.  Differentiating factors between erythropoiesis-stimulating agents: an update to selection for anaemia of chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Walter H Hörl
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.