Literature DB >> 18393160

Radiosurgery/stereotactic radiotherapy in the therapeutical concept for skull base meningiomas.

K Hamm1, M Henzel, M W Gross, G Surber, G Kleinert, R Engenhart-Cabillic.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Microsurgical resection is still the treatment of choice for skull base meningiomas. But the risk of postoperative neurological deficits is high, and in many of these cases complete tumor removal cannot be achieved. Therefore recurrences are even more probable. Stereotactically guided radiation therapy - radiosurgery (RS) or stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) - offers an additional or alternate treatment option for those patients. We evaluated local control rates, symptomatology, and toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 224 patients were treated with stereotactically guided radiation techniques in two departments between 1997 and 2003. 129 of 224 had recurrences after 1 to 3 prior tumor resections and 95 of 224 were treated with SRT/RS alone. 87.9% of cases had benign, 7.8% had atypical and 4.3% had malignant meningiomas. RS was only applied in 11 cases. Tumor volumes ranged from 0.16 ccm to 3.56 ccm. The other 213 patients had larger tumor volumes of up to 135 ccm or a meningioma close to optical structures. Therefore 183 cases were treated with SRT in normal fractions of 1.8-2 Gy in single doses up to 60 Gy. Hypofractionated SRT with single fraction doses of 5 or 4 Gy was applied in 30 cases. Follow-up data were available in 181 skull base meningiomas and the progression-free and overall survival rates, the toxicity and symptomatology were evaluated.
RESULTS: The median follow-up was 36 months. The overall survival and the progression-free survival rates for 5 years were 92.9%, and 96.9%, respectively. Two tumor progressions have occurred to date but further follow up is required. Tumor volumes (TV) had shrunk about by 19.7% at 6 months (p<0.0001) and by 23.2% at 12 months (p<0.01) after SRT/RS. In 95.6% the symptoms had improved or were stable. Clinically significant acute toxicity (grade III) was seen in only 1 case (2.7%). Some patients developed late toxicity: 8.8% had grade I, 4.4% had grade II and 1.1% had grade III. No other neurological deficits occurred during follow-up.
CONCLUSION: SRT and RS offer an additional or alternative treatment option with a high efficacy and few side effects for the tumor control of skull base meningiomas. An individual and interdisciplinary decision respecting treatment is needed for each patient. In cases of large TV (>4 ccm), tumors adjacent to critical structures (<2 mm) or in high-risk patients the use of SRT offers greater benefits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18393160     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-992138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zentralbl Neurochir        ISSN: 0044-4251


  18 in total

1.  High symptom improvement and local tumor control using stereotactic radiotherapy when given early after diagnosis of meningioma. A multicentre study.

Authors:  I Compter; K Zaugg; R M A Houben; J T A Dings; G Bosmans; C Buescher; M M H M E Anten; B G Baumert
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-09-09       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 2.  Meningiomas: knowledge base, treatment outcomes, and uncertainties. A RANO review.

Authors:  Leland Rogers; Igor Barani; Marc Chamberlain; Thomas J Kaley; Michael McDermott; Jeffrey Raizer; David Schiff; Damien C Weber; Patrick Y Wen; Michael A Vogelbaum
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  WHO grade of intracranial meningiomas differs with respect to patient's age, location, tumor size and peritumoral edema.

Authors:  Anne Ressel; Susanne Fichte; Michael Brodhun; Steffen K Rosahl; Ruediger Gerlach
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 4.  Does Proton Therapy Have a Future in CNS Tumors?

Authors:  Stephanie E Combs
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.598

5.  Optic toxicity in radiation treatment of meningioma: a retrospective study in 213 patients.

Authors:  Mostafa Farzin; Michael Molls; Severin Kampfer; Sabrina Astner; Ralf Schneider; Karin Roth; Michaela Dobrei; Stephanie Combs; Christoph Straube
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Patterns of failure after stereotactic radiotherapy of intracranial meningioma.

Authors:  Vasileios Askoxylakis; Angelika Zabel-du Bois; Wolfgang Schlegel; Jürgen Debus; Peter Huber; Stefanie Milker-Zabel
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2009-12-13       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 7.  FACT-MNG: tumor site specific web-based outcome instrument for meningioma patients.

Authors:  D Zlotnick; S N Kalkanis; A Quinones-Hinojosa; K Chung; M E Linskey; R L Jensen; F DeMonte; F G Barker; C A Racine; M S Berger; P M Black; M Cusimano; L N Sekhar; A Parsa; M Aghi; Michael W McDermott
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT) for who grade I anterior clinoid meningiomas (ACM).

Authors:  Selcuk Demiral; Ferrat Dincoglan; Omer Sager; Hakan Gamsiz; Bora Uysal; Esin Gundem; Yelda Elcim; Bahar Dirican; Murat Beyzadeoglu
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 9.  Radiotherapy and radiosurgery for benign skull base meningiomas.

Authors:  Giuseppe Minniti; Maurizio Amichetti; Riccardo Maurizi Enrici
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Review of photon and proton radiotherapy for skull base tumours.

Authors:  Piero Fossati; Andrea Vavassori; Letizia Deantonio; Eleonora Ferrara; Marco Krengli; Roberto Orecchia
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-04-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.