Literature DB >> 18393008

Methods of fetal movement counting and the detection of fetal compromise.

A E P Heazell1, J F Frøen.   

Abstract

Maternal perception of fetal movements is widely used as a marker of fetal viability and well-being. A reduction in fetal movements is associated with fetal hypoxia, increased incidence of stillbirth and fetal growth restriction (FGR). Therefore, a reduction in fetal movements has been proposed as a screening tool for FGR or fetal compromise. The problem of this approach is that there is no widely accepted definition of reduced fetal activity or 'alarm limits', and pregnant women are currently given a wide range of non-evidence-based advice. We have reviewed the background of published definitions and their potential usefulness in screening. A formal meta-analysis of these studies is not possible due to variation in methodology and definitions of reduced fetal movements. Assessment of fetal movements using formal fetal movement counting has shown equivocal results. Importantly, in all studies, there was a decrease in perinatal mortality suggesting a beneficial role for raising maternal awareness of fetal movements. Most studies implemented limits to define reduced fetal movements based on small groups of high risk pregnancies and obsolete counting methodology. A single case-control study developed 'normal limits' in a low risk population, and successfully implemented it prospectively for screening. At present, there is no evidence that any absolute definition of reduced fetal movements is of greater value than maternal subjective perception of reduced fetal movements in the detection of intrauterine fetal death or fetal compromise. Further investigation is required to determine an effective method of identifying patients with reduced fetal movements and to determine the best subsequent management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18393008     DOI: 10.1080/01443610801912618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0144-3615            Impact factor:   1.246


  36 in total

1.  Diagnostic value of fetal movement counting by mother and the optimal recording duration.

Authors:  Mahin Kamalifard; Shamsi Abbasalizadeh; Morteza Ghojazadeh; Fatemeh Ghatreh Samani; Leila Rabiei
Journal:  J Caring Sci       Date:  2013-06-01

Review 2.  Management of reported decreased fetal movements for improving pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  G Justus Hofmeyr; Natalia Novikova
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-04-18

3.  The value of reporting decreased or absent fetal movements by mothers in predicting the pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  Farahnaz Torkestani; Nafiseh Zafarghandi; Ali Davati; Shahrzad Hadav; Sahar Farzinmoghadam; Zahra Nasiri
Journal:  Iran J Med Sci       Date:  2011-09

4.  Reduced fetal movements at term, low-risk pregnancies: is it associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes? Ten years of experience from a single tertiary center.

Authors:  Michal Levy; Michal Kovo; Giulia Barda; Ohad Gluck; Liron Koren; Jacob Bar; Eran Weiner
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 2.344

5.  The effect of glucose administration on perceived fetal movements in women with decreased fetal movement, a double-blinded placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  N Michaan; Y Baruch; M Topilsky; S Amzalag; I Iaskov; A Many; S Maslovitz
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.521

6.  An investigation of fetal behavioural states during maternal sleep in healthy late gestation pregnancy: an observational study.

Authors:  Peter R Stone; Wendy Burgess; Jordan McIntyre; Alistair J Gunn; Christopher A Lear; Laura Bennet; Edwin A Mitchell; John M D Thompson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Placental pathology in pregnancies with maternally perceived decreased fetal movement--a population-based nested case-cohort study.

Authors:  Brita Askeland Winje; Borghild Roald; Nina Petrov Kristensen; J Frederik Frøen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Implementation of uniform information on fetal movement in a Norwegian population reduced delayed reporting of decreased fetal movement and stillbirths in primiparous women - a clinical quality improvement.

Authors:  Eli Saastad; Julie Victoria Holm Tveit; Vicki Flenady; Babill Stray-Pedersen; Ruth C Fretts; Per E Børdahl; J Frederik Frøen
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2010-01-04

9.  A cross-sectional study of maternal perception of fetal movements and antenatal advice in a general pregnant population, using a qualitative framework.

Authors:  Camille H Raynes-Greenow; Adrienne Gordon; Qiushuang Li; Jon A Hyett
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  A randomised controlled trial comparing standard or intensive management of reduced fetal movements after 36 weeks gestation--a feasibility study.

Authors:  Alexander E P Heazell; Giovanna Bernatavicius; Stephen A Roberts; Ainslie Garrod; Melissa K Whitworth; Edward D Johnstone; Joanna C Gillham; Tina Lavender
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.