BACKGROUND: Gastric sleeve resection was initially planned as the first step of bilio-pancreatic diversion with duodenal switch but it continues to emerge as a restrictive bariatric procedure on its own. We describe intermediate results in a series of 126 laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomies (LSG) compiled from three bariatric centers in eastern Austria. METHODS: The stomach was laparoscopically reduced to a "sleeve" along the lesser curvature over a 48-Fr bougie. Special attention was placed on complete resection of the gastric fundus. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 19.1 months, patients had lost between 2.3 and 27 kg/m(2) or between 6.7% and 130% of their excessive weight. Sixty four percent of the patients lost >50% of their excess weight within an average of 20 months. Seven percent of the patients had an excess weight loss <25% and were therefore considered as failures. The only major surgical complication was leakage of the staple-line needing revision (three times). There were no operative mortalities. CONCLUSION: The final place of LSG in bariatric surgery is still unclear, but our results and those of others show that LSG can be a viable alternative to established procedures.
BACKGROUND: Gastric sleeve resection was initially planned as the first step of bilio-pancreatic diversion with duodenal switch but it continues to emerge as a restrictive bariatric procedure on its own. We describe intermediate results in a series of 126 laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomies (LSG) compiled from three bariatric centers in eastern Austria. METHODS: The stomach was laparoscopically reduced to a "sleeve" along the lesser curvature over a 48-Fr bougie. Special attention was placed on complete resection of the gastric fundus. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 19.1 months, patients had lost between 2.3 and 27 kg/m(2) or between 6.7% and 130% of their excessive weight. Sixty four percent of the patients lost >50% of their excess weight within an average of 20 months. Seven percent of the patients had an excess weight loss <25% and were therefore considered as failures. The only major surgical complication was leakage of the staple-line needing revision (three times). There were no operative mortalities. CONCLUSION: The final place of LSG in bariatric surgery is still unclear, but our results and those of others show that LSG can be a viable alternative to established procedures.
Authors: F B Langer; M A Reza Hoda; A Bohdjalian; F X Felberbauer; J Zacherl; E Wenzl; K Schindler; A Luger; B Ludvik; G Prager Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Felix B Langer; Arthur Bohdjalian; Franz X Felberbauer; Edith Fleischmann; Mir A Reza Hoda; Bernhard Ludvik; Johannes Zacherl; Raimund Jakesz; Gerhard Prager Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: David Benaiges; Antonio Más-Lorenzo; Albert Goday; José M Ramon; Juan J Chillarón; Juan Pedro-Botet; Juana A Flores-Le Roux Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-11-07 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Luigi Angrisani; Pier Paolo Cutolo; Jane N Buchwald; Tim W McGlennon; Gabriella Nosso; Francesco Persico; Brunella Capaldo; Silvia Savastano Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Christine Stroh; D Birk; R Flade-Kuthe; M Frenken; B Herbig; S Höhne; H Köhler; V Lange; K Ludwig; R Matkowitz; G Meyer; P Pick; Th Horbach; S Krause; L Schäfer; M Schlensak; E Shang; T Sonnenberg; M Susewind; H Voigt; R Weiner; S Wolff; A M Wolf; U Schmidt; H Lippert; Th Manger Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2009-01-29 Impact factor: 4.129