Literature DB >> 18392605

[Is rehabilitation of erectile function following pelvic surgery reasonable? Review of the literature: from sports to PDE5 inhibitors].

M J Mathers1, T Klotz, W Vahlensieck, M Zellner, G Lümmen, S Roth, H Huland, F Sommer.   

Abstract

Increasingly, urologists are seeing patients with erectile dysfunction after pelvic operations. In most cases, radical prostatectomy is the cause. Even when a nerve-sparing procedure is performed, approximately 50% of the patients suffer from erectile dysfunction. This report discusses the causes and theoretical therapies, including lifestyle changes, strategies for neuroregeneration and the associated prevention of apoptosis of the smooth muscle of the corpus cavernosum and improvement of the corpora cavernosa by increased oxygenation. According to the international literature, many of these agents and lifestyle modifications display promise for treating impotence. Early treatment for patients recovering from pelvic operations seems to be reasonable. It is assumed that the natural recovery of erections may take as long as 18 to 24 months postsurgery or even longer; however, treatment modalities may reduce the time to erectile recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18392605     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-008-1668-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  54 in total

Review 1.  Strategies to promote recovery of cavernous nerve function after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Arthur L Burnett
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2002-12-10       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Cavernous oxygen tension in the patients with erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  F Tarhan; U Kuyumcuoğlu; A Kolsuz; A Ozgül; O Cangüven
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.896

3.  Recovery of spontaneous erectile function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy with and without early intracavernous injections of alprostadil: results of a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  F Montorsi; G Guazzoni; L F Strambi; L F Da Pozzo; L Nava; L Barbieri; P Rigatti; G Pizzini; A Miani
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention.

Authors:  P C Walsh; P J Donker
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  Obesity, the metabolic syndrome, and sexual dysfunction.

Authors:  K Esposito; D Giugliano
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.896

6.  Changes in Penile Morphometrics in Men with Erectile Dysfunction after Nerve-Sparing Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Mol Urol       Date:  1999

7.  Sexual dysfunction in the United States: prevalence and predictors.

Authors:  E O Laumann; A Paik; R C Rosen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-02-10       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The natural progression and remission of erectile dysfunction: results from the Massachusetts Male Aging Study.

Authors:  Thomas G Travison; Ridwan Shabsigh; Andre B Araujo; Varant Kupelian; Amy B O'Donnell; John B McKinlay
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Cigarette smoking as risk factor for erectile dysfunction: results from an Italian epidemiological study.

Authors:  Vincenzo Mirone; Ciro Imbimbo; Angela Bortolotti; Elisabetta Di Cintio; Enrico Colli; Marina Landoni; Maurizio Lavezzari; Fabio Parazzini
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Oxygen tension regulates the nitric oxide pathway. Physiological role in penile erection.

Authors:  N Kim; Y Vardi; H Padma-Nathan; J Daley; I Goldstein; I Saenz de Tejada
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 14.808

View more
  2 in total

1.  [Counselling for erectile dysfunction during inpatient rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy].

Authors:  W Vahlensieck; F Sommer; M J Mathers; T Gilbert; R Waidelich
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  [Specialist uro-oncological rehabilitation after treatment for prostate cancer--update 2015. Position statement of the working group on "rehabilitation of urological and nephrological diseases" of the German Society of Urology with respect to current S3 guidelines].

Authors:  G Müller; U Otto; W Vahlensieck; D-H Zermann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 0.639

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.