| Literature DB >> 18392506 |
Abrão Rapoport1, Olger de Souza Tornin, Ivo Marques Beserra Júnior, Paulo Bentes de Carvalho Neto, Ricardo Pires de Souza.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Carotid involvement by metastatic lymph nodes changes the approach in head and neck tumors. AIM: To evaluate interobserver agreement by CT scan analysis regarding the involvement of the carotid artery by metastatic lymph nodes from squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract and its relation to resection criteria.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18392506 PMCID: PMC9450667 DOI: 10.1016/s1808-8694(15)30755-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Otorhinolaryngol ISSN: 1808-8686
Figure 1axial CT with endovenous contrast. Lymphadenomegaly / high jugular-carotid (level II) lymph node block (BL) to the right with a contact interface below 50% of the internal carotid artery circumference. CI: internal carotid artery; CE: external carotid artery.
Figure 2axial CT with endovenous contrast. – high jugular-carotid (level II) lymph node block (BL) to the left with a contact interface below 50% of the internal carotid artery circumference. CI: internal carotid artery; CE: external carotid artery.
Figure 3axial CT (4 sequential sections) with endovenous contrast. High jugular-carotid (level II) lymph node block (BL) to the left with signs of rupture of the capsule and a contact interface over 50% of the internal carotid artery circumference (arrow).
Assessment of interobserver agreement according to the calculated Kappa index
| KAPPA INDEX VALUE | AGREEMENT |
|---|---|
| < 0,20 | NEGLIGIBLE |
| 0,21 – 0,40 | MINIMAL |
| 0,41 – 0,60 | MODERATE |
| 0,61 – 0,80 | GOOD |
| 0,81 – 1,0 | EXCELLENT |
Result of observer assessment in absolute numbers (simplified classification)
| Observer 1 | Observer 2 | Observer 3 | Observer 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0–50% | 96 | 102 | 105 | 102 |
| 51–100% | 30 | 24 | 21 | 24 |
| Total | 126 | 126 | 126 | 126 |
Interobserver agreement – simplified classification
| Kappa | Confidence interval | P | Agreement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 – 50% | 0,535 | 0,46 – 0,60 | < 0,0001 | Moderate |
| 51 –100% | 0,535 | 0,46 – 0,60 | < 0,0001 | Moderate |
general Kappa = 0.535
CI = Confidence interval – 95%; sup. 0.606; inf. 0.464
p < 0.001
Result of observer assessment in absolute numbers (complex classification)
| Observer 1 | Observer 2 | Observer 3 | Observer 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0–25% | 61 | 47 | 37 | 51 |
| 26–50% | 35 | 55 | 68 | 51 |
| 51–75% | 8 | 19 | 13 | 13 |
| 76–100% | 22 | 5 | 8 | 11 |
| Total | 126 | 126 | 126 | 126 |
Interobserver agreement – complex classification
| Kappa | Confidence interval | P | Agreement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0–25% | 0,499 | 0,42–0,57 | <0,0001 | Moderate |
| 26–50% | 0,294 | 0,22–0,36 | <0,0001 | Minimal |
| 51–75% | 0,206 | 0,13–0,27 | <0,0001 | Negligible |
| 76–100% | 0,362 | 0,29–0,43 | <0,0001 | Minimal |
general Kappa = 0.364
CI = Confidence interval – 95%; sup. 0.412; inf. 0.316
p < 0.001