| Literature DB >> 18392503 |
Maurício Duarte da Conceição1, Luciana Sassa Marocchio, Olinda Tárzia.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Tonsil caseous affects a significant percentage of the population. Surgeries, conservative or not, have been the only viable alternatives of treatment. However, today there is still not, up to now, an economical and non-invasive treatment that presents satisfactory results. AIMS: The objectives of this study are to evaluate the efficiency of a mouthwash, with active ingredients that associate oxygenating and antimicrobial substances, in the reduction of caseous and tongue coating formation, whose etiology is similar to caseous, and to evaluate the reduction of the volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs) concentration. STUDYEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18392503 PMCID: PMC9450570 DOI: 10.1016/s1808-8694(15)30752-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Otorhinolaryngol ISSN: 1808-8686
Figure 1Caseum inside a tonsil crypt.
Figure 2Halimeter® RH 17.
Results from the group that used the placebo solution.
| Number of the volunteer | Frequency of caseum at every 04 weeks | Halitometry – VSC in PPB | Level of tongue saburra (from 0 to 5) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial | Final | Initial | Final | Initial | Final | |
| 1. | 4 | 4 | 171 | 180 | 2 | 2 |
| 2. | 1 | 0 | 151 | 26 | 2 | 2 |
| 3. | 4 | 4 | 102 | 131 | 1 | 2 |
| 4. | 1 | 10 | 54 | 35 | 0 | 1 |
| 5. | 2 | 4 | 54 | 18 | 1 | 1 |
| 6. | 4 | 4 | 155 | 79 | 1 | 1 |
| 7. | 3 | 2 | 182 | 332 | 3 | 3 |
| 8. | 4 | 3 | 151 | 20 | 2 | 1 |
| 9. | 1 | 0 | 95 | 308 | 1 | 2 |
| 10. | 2 | 2 | 156 | 127 | 3 | 1 |
| 11. | 2 | 0 | 35 | 20 | 1 | 2 |
| 12. | 4 | 1 | 514 | 49 | 2 | 1 |
| 13. | 2 | 0 | 169 | 63 | 1 | 3 |
| 14. | 4 | 1 | 84 | 75 | 1 | 1 |
| 15. | 3 | 1 | 50 | 41 | 1 | 1 |
| 16. | 2 | 0 | 46 | 39 | 1 | 1 |
| 17. | 4 | 2 | 56 | 183 | 1 | 3 |
| 18. | 8 | 1 | 180 | 116 | 1 | 1 |
| 19. | 2 | 0 | 58 | 364 | 3 | 2 |
| 20. | 1 | 1 | 123 | 96 | 1 | 1 |
| 21. | 4 | 3 | 37 | 40 | 1 | 1 |
| 22. | 3 | 3 | 72 | 76 | 1 | 2 |
| 23. | 6 | 6 | 221 | 220 | 1 | 1 |
| 24. | 4 | 0 | 46 | 59 | 3 | 1 |
| 25. | 2 | 1 | 29 | 55 | 1 | 1 |
| MEAN | 3,08 | 2,12 | 119,64 | 110,08 | 1,44 | 1,52 |
T-Student test carried out in the INITIAL and FINAL variables to check the statistical significance of the group that used the placebo solution.
| Variable | t-Student | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Frequency of caseum at every 04 weeks | 1,78 | Not significant, equal samples, alpha > 0.05. |
| Halitometry VSC in ppb | 0,35 | Not significant, equal samples, alpha > 0.05. |
| Intensity of tongue saburra (from 0 to 5) | 0,40 | Not significant, equal samples, alpha > 0.05. |
Pearson's correlation test applied to the variables after calculating the INITIAL data minus the FINAL at the end of treatment for the group that used the placebo solution.
| Variables | r | Correlation |
|---|---|---|
| Caseum frequency at every 04 weeks X Halitometry – VSC ppb | 0,0695 | There is no correlation among the variables |
| Caseum frequency at every 04 weeks X Intensity of tongue saburra (from 0 to 5) | 0,2155 | There is no correlation among the variables |
| Halitometry – VSC ppb X Intensity of tongue saburra (from 0 to 5) | 0,1815 | There is no correlation among the variables |
Results from the group that used the mouthwash
| Number of the volunteer | Frequency of caseum at every 04 weeks | Halitometry – VSC in PPB | Level of tongue saburra (from 0 to 5) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial | Final | Initial | Final | Initial | Final | |
| 26. | 2 | 0 | 329 | 40 | 3 | 2 |
| 27. | 3 | 1 | 54 | 58 | 1 | 1 |
| 28. | 2 | 0 | 94 | 29 | 1 | 0 |
| 29. | 2 | 0 | 296 | 62 | 3 | 1 |
| 30. | 3 | 0 | 483 | 10 | 3 | 1 |
| 31. | 2 | 0 | 35 | 15 | 1 | 1 |
| 32. | 10 | 4 | 65 | 43 | 0 | 1 |
| 33. | 4 | 2 | 414 | 133 | 4 | 2 |
| 34. | 2 | 0 | 158 | 50 | 2 | 1 |
| 35. | 12 | 2 | 212 | 48 | 1 | 1 |
| 36. | 4 | 2 | 57 | 18 | 1 | 1 |
| 37. | 8 | 2 | 139 | 53 | 2 | 1 |
| 38. | 30 | 4 | 194 | 38 | 1 | 1 |
| 39. | 2 | 1 | 55 | 20 | 3 | 1 |
| 40. | 2 | 0 | 33 | 24 | 1 | 0 |
| 41. | 8 | 1 | 55 | 42 | 1 | 1 |
| 42. | 4 | 1 | 75 | 81 | 1 | 1 |
| 43. | 2 | 0 | 18 | 75 | 2 | 2 |
| 44. | 2 | 0 | 327 | 38 | 3 | 1 |
| 45. | 3 | 0 | 40 | 17 | 1 | 1 |
| 46. | 3 | 1 | 96 | 10 | 1 | 0 |
| 47. | 2 | 1 | 75 | 08 | 1 | 1 |
| 48. | 2 | 0 | 78 | 30 | 1 | 1 |
| 49. | 2 | 1 | 65 | 19 | 1 | 1 |
| 50. | 3 | 0 | 92 | 43 | 2 | 1 |
| MEAN | 4,76 | 0,92 | 141,56 | 40,16 | 1,64 | 1 |
T-Student test carried out in the INITIAL and FINAL variables to check the statistical significance of the group that used the mouthwash.
| Variables | t-Student | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| Caseum frequency at every 04 weeks | 3,78 | Significante ao nível de 1% (alfa = 0,01). |
| VSC ppb from the halitometry | 4,09 | Significante ao nível de 1% (alfa = 0,01). |
| Intensity of tongue saburra (from 0 to 5) | 3,72 | Significante ao nível de 1% (alfa = 0,01). |
Pearson's correlation test applied to the variables after calculating the INITIAL data minus the FINAL from the treatment of the group that used the mouthwash.
| Variables | r | Correlation |
|---|---|---|
| Caseum frequency at every 04 weeks | 0,0847 | There is no correlation among the variables |
| VSC ppb from the halitometry | -0,2712 | There is no correlation among the variables |
| Intensity of tongue saburra (from 0 to 5) | 0,6535 | There is correlation at the level of 1% (Alpha = 0.01). |