Literature DB >> 18392447

Comparison of scientists of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences and of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA on the basis of the h-index.

R Mugnaini1, A L Packer, R Meneghini.   

Abstract

A new scientometric indicator, the h-index, has been recently proposed (Hirsch JE. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2005; 102: 16569-16572). The index avoids some shortcomings of the calculation of the total number of citations as a parameter to evaluate scientific performance. Although it has become known only recently, it has had widespread acceptance. A comparison of the average h-index of members of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences (BAS) and of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA (NAS-USA) was carried out for 10 different areas of science. Although, as expected, the comparison was unfavorable to the members of the BAS, the imbalance was distinct in different areas. Since these two academies represent, to a significant extent, the science of top quality produced in each country, the comparison allows the identification of the areas in Brazil that are closer to the international stakeholders of scientific excellence. The areas of Physics and Mathematics stand out in this context. The heterogeneity of the h-index in the different areas, estimated by the median dispersion of the index, is significantly higher in the BAS than in the NAS-USA. No elements have been collected in the present study to provide an explanation for this fact.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18392447     DOI: 10.1590/s0100-879x2008000400001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res        ISSN: 0100-879X            Impact factor:   2.590


  4 in total

Review 1.  How has healthcare research performance been assessed?: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vanash M Patel; Hutan Ashrafian; Kamran Ahmed; Sonal Arora; Sejal Jiwan; Jeremy K Nicholson; Ara Darzi; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Productivity of CNPq Researchers from Different Fields in Biomedical Sciences: The Need for Objective Bibliometric Parameters-A Report from Brazil.

Authors:  Jean Paul Kamdem; Daniel Henrique Roos; Adekunle Adeniran Sanmi; Luciana Calabró; Amos Olalekan Abolaji; Cláudia Sirlene de Oliveira; Luiz Marivando Barros; Antonia Eliene Duarte; Nilda Vargas Barbosa; Diogo Onofre Souza; João Batista Teixeira Rocha
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Visualizing highly cited scientific output of Indian physiotherapists: A bibliometric study.

Authors:  Arun Vijay Subbarayalu; Manuelraj Peter; Mohamed Idhris; Sivasankar Prabaharan; Muhil Sakthivel; Vinoth Raman; Palanivel R M; Ola Ibrahim Ramzi
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2020-03-24

4.  Bibliometric profile of the African Academy of Sciences medical and health sciences fellows.

Authors:  Joseph Balogun; Efe Mamuzo; Friday Okonofua; Adetutu Balogun; Adetoyeje Oyeyemi
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2021-01-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.