Literature DB >> 18390099

Accuracy of pregnancy diagnosis in swine by ultrasonography.

Sara I Williams1, Pablo Piñeyro, R Luzbel de la Sota.   

Abstract

Early and accurate diagnosis of nonpregnant sows and gilts has the potential to increase reproductive efficiency and the financial income in pig production by reducing non-productive days per sow per year. The objectives of this study were to compare the efficiency of pregnancy diagnosis between Doppler Echo+ and real time ultrasonography (RTU) and to compare the efficiency by using RTU at different days post-mating (days 17 to 24) under commercial conditions. In the 1st study, using crossbreed sows and gilts (n=107), pregnancy diagnoses were done with Doppler Echo+ and then with RTU. Between 28 and 65 days of gestation, Doppler Echo+ had 85% sensitivity and 32% specificity, and efficiency was 73%. In the 2nd study, sows (n=142) were scanned for pregnancy diagnosis between 17 and 24 d post-mating (PD1) and reconfirmed between 38 and 45 days of gestation (PD2). After 21 days of gestation, RTU had over 90% sensitivity and 45% specificity, and 70% efficiency. Accuracy between PD1-farrowing was 75.5% and between PD1 and PD2 was 80.6%. In the 3rd study, sows were diagnosed pregnant by RTU (n=151) at 17 to 24 days of gestation or A-mode ultrasound (n=172) at 28 to 30 days of gestation. There were no significant differences in conception rate (P > 0.09) and farrowing rate (P > 0.67) between both groups. Hence, there was no improvement in fertility and farrowing rate by using RTU instead of A-mode ultrasound under commercial conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18390099      PMCID: PMC2249720     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Vet J        ISSN: 0008-5286            Impact factor:   1.008


  11 in total

1.  Pregnancy diagnosis in sows: direct ELISA for estrone in feces and its prospects for an on-farm test, in comparison to ultrasonography.

Authors:  E A Vos; R van Oord; M A Taverne; T A Kruip
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Early diagnosis of pregnancy in sows by ultrasound evaluation of embryo development and uterine echotexture.

Authors:  F De Resnis; E Bigliardi; E Parmigiani; A R Peters
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2000-09-02       Impact factor: 2.695

3.  [Possibilities and limits of pregnancy diagnosis in domestic animals using the ultrasonic Doppler technic].

Authors:  G Weiss
Journal:  Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 0.845

4.  Use of an on-farm progesterone assay kit to determine pregnancy in sows.

Authors:  C E Glossop; J A Foulkes; A Whitworth; E Cornwell
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1989-02-04       Impact factor: 2.695

5.  Use of ultrasound scanning in swine for detection of pregnancy and some pathological conditions.

Authors:  O Botero; F Martinat-Botté; F Bariteau
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Early pregnancy diagnosis in sows by ultrasonic linear electronic scanning.

Authors:  T Inaba; Y Nakazima; N Matsui; T Imori
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  [Results and experiences of a two-year investigation in the use of sonographic pregnancy control in sows at different stages of gestation].

Authors:  J Kauffold; A Richter; A Sobiraj
Journal:  Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 0.488

8.  Occurrence of two phases of return to oestrus in sows on commercial units.

Authors:  C E Glossop; J A Foulkes
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  1988-02-13       Impact factor: 2.695

9.  Pregnancy diagnosis in swine: a comparison of the accuracies of mechanical and endocrine tests with return to estrus.

Authors:  G W Almond; G D Dial
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1986-12-15       Impact factor: 1.936

10.  Pregnancy diagnosis in pigs: a field study comparing linear-array real-time ultrasound scanning and amplitude depth analysis.

Authors:  M A Taverne; L Oving; M van Lieshout; A H Willemse
Journal:  Vet Q       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.320

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals early pregnancy-specific genes expressed in peripheral blood of pregnant sows.

Authors:  Junye Shen; Chuanli Zhou; Shien Zhu; Wenqing Shi; Maishun Hu; Xiangwei Fu; Chuduan Wang; Yachun Wang; Qin Zhang; Ying Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Evaluation of a Numerical, Real-Time Ultrasound Imaging Model for the Prediction of Litter Size in Pregnant Sows, with Machine Learning.

Authors:  Konstantinos Kousenidis; Georgios Kirtsanis; Efstathia Karageorgiou; Dimitrios Tsiokos
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-31       Impact factor: 3.231

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.