Literature DB >> 18389697

Comparative effect of direct-fed microbials on fecal shedding of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella in naturally infected feedlot cattle.

Ebot S Tabe1, James Oloya, Dawn K Doetkott, Marc L Bauer, Penelope S Gibbs, Margaret L Khaitsa.   

Abstract

The effect of direct-fed microbials (DFM) on fecal shedding of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella in naturally infected feedlot cattle was evaluated in a clinical trial involving 138 feedlot steers. Following standard laboratory methods, fecal samples collected from steers were evaluated for change in the detectable levels of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella shed in feces after DFM treatment. Sampling of steers was carried out every 3 weeks for 84 days. A significant reduction (32%) in fecal shedding of E. coli O157:H7 (P < 0.001), but not Salmonella (P = 0.24), was observed among the treatment steers compared with the control group during finishing. The probability of recovery of E. coli O157:H7 from the feces of treated and control steers was 34.0 and 66.0%, respectively. Steers placed on DFM supplement were almost three times less likely to shed E. coli O157:H7 (odds ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.25 to 0.53; P < 0.001) in their feces as opposed to their control counterparts. The probability of recovery of Salmonella from the feces of the control (14.0%) and the treated (11.3%) steers was similar. However, the DFM significantly reduced probability of new infections with Salmonella among DFM-treated cattle compared with controls (nontreated ones). It appears that DFM as applied in our study are capable of significantly reducing fecal shedding of E. coli O157:H7 in naturally infected cattle but not Salmonella. The factors responsible for the observed difference in the effects of DFM on E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella warrants further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18389697     DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-71.3.539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Prot        ISSN: 0362-028X            Impact factor:   2.077


  6 in total

Review 1.  Survival of Escherichia coli in the environment: fundamental and public health aspects.

Authors:  Jan Dirk van Elsas; Alexander V Semenov; Rodrigo Costa; Jack T Trevors
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  Fates of acid-resistant and non-acid-resistant Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains in ruminant digestive contents in the absence and presence of probiotics.

Authors:  Frédérique Chaucheyras-Durand; Fahima Faqir; Aurélie Ameilbonne; Christine Rozand; Christine Martin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  Nutraceuticals: An Alternative Strategy for the Use of Antimicrobials.

Authors:  Michael A Ballou; Emily M Davis; Benjamin A Kasl
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.357

4.  Effects of Multi-Species Direct-Fed Microbial Products on Ruminal Metatranscriptome and Carboxyl-Metabolome of Beef Steers.

Authors:  Megan McCoun; Adeoye Oyebade; Zaira M Estrada-Reyes; Andres A Pech-Cervantes; Ibukun M Ogunade
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Effect of a direct-fed microbial (10-G Armor) on feedlot performance, carcass characteristics, and prevalence of Salmonella in fed-beef heifers.

Authors:  Lauren M Mayer; Kevin Martens; Alyssa B Word; Ben P Holland; Loni L Lucherk; Ty E Lawrence; Travis C Tennant
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-05-26

6.  Safety and protective effectiveness of two strains of Lactobacillus with probiotic features in an experimental model of salmonellosis.

Authors:  Raphael S Steinberg; Lilian C S Silva; Tássia C Souza; Maurício T Lima; Nayara L G de Oliveira; Leda Q Vieira; Rosa M E Arantes; Anderson Miyoshi; Jacques R Nicoli; Elisabeth Neumann; Alvaro C Nunes
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.