Literature DB >> 18389492

Consequences of dichotomization.

Valerii Fedorov1, Frank Mannino, Rongmei Zhang.   

Abstract

Dichotomization is the transformation of a continuous outcome (response) to a binary outcome. This approach, while somewhat common, is harmful from the viewpoint of statistical estimation and hypothesis testing. We show that this leads to loss of information, which can be large. For normally distributed data, this loss in terms of Fisher's information is at least 1-2/pi (or 36%). In other words, 100 continuous observations are statistically equivalent to 158 dichotomized observations. The amount of information lost depends greatly on the prior choice of cut points, with the optimal cut point depending upon the unknown parameters. The loss of information leads to loss of power or conversely a sample size increase to maintain power. Only in certain cases, for instance, in estimating a value of the cumulative distribution function and when the assumed model is very different from the true model, can the use of dichotomized outcomes be considered a reasonable approach.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18389492     DOI: 10.1002/pst.331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Stat        ISSN: 1539-1604            Impact factor:   1.894


  63 in total

1.  Hospital Volume and Survival After Hepatocellular Carcinoma Diagnosis.

Authors:  Ali A Mokdad; Hong Zhu; Jorge A Marrero; John C Mansour; Amit G Singal; Adam C Yopp
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Analysis by categorizing or dichotomizing continuous variables is inadvisable: an example from the natural history of unruptured aneurysms.

Authors:  O Naggara; J Raymond; F Guilbert; D Roy; A Weill; D G Altman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Clinical trial design in the neurocritical care unit.

Authors:  C E Hall; M Mirski; Y Y Palesch; M N Diringer; A I Qureshi; C S Robertson; R Geocadin; C A C Wijman; P D Le Roux; Jose I Suarez
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  The importance of social ties in sustaining medication adherence in resource-limited settings.

Authors:  Alexander C Tsai; David R Bangsberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Treatment Outcome, Duration, and Costs: A Comparison of Performance Indicators Using Data from Eight Mental Health Care Providers in The Netherlands.

Authors:  E de Beurs; E H Warmerdam; S C C Oudejans; M Spits; P Dingemanse; S D D de Graaf; I W de Groot; H Houben; W G E Kuyck; E O Noorthoorn; M A Nugter; S C C Robbers; G E van Son
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2018-03

6.  Efficacy of Inhaled Cannabis on Painful Diabetic Neuropathy.

Authors:  Mark S Wallace; Thomas D Marcotte; Anya Umlauf; Ben Gouaux; Joseph H Atkinson
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 5.820

7.  Likelihood-based analysis of outcome-dependent sampling designs with longitudinal data.

Authors:  Leila R Zelnick; Jonathan S Schildcrout; Patrick J Heagerty
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Comparison of models for analyzing two-group, cross-sectional data with a Gaussian outcome subject to a detection limit.

Authors:  Ryan E Wiegand; Charles E Rose; John M Karon
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 9.  Benchmarking B-cell epitope prediction for the design of peptide-based vaccines: problems and prospects.

Authors:  Salvador Eugenio C Caoili
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2010-03-30

10.  Comparison of outcomes following thrombolytic therapy among patients with prior stroke and diabetes in the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive (VISTA).

Authors:  Nishant Kumar Mishra; Stephen M Davis; Markku Kaste; Kennedy R Lees
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 19.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.