Literature DB >> 18389264

Short-term results of hip revisions with a curved cementless modular stem in association with the surgical approach.

Bernd Fink1, Alexandra Grossmann, Svenja Schubring, Martin S Schulz, Martin Fuerst.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A prospective study was designed to test the hypothesis that short-term results after hip revisions are in association with the surgical approach with lower clinical scores for the transfemoral approach.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 hip revision operations with the modular cementless revision stem "Revitan Curved" (Zimmer GmbH, Winterthur, Switzerland), of which 42 replacements involved an endofemoral (posterolateral) approach and 78 implantations a transfemoral approach, were followed up over a period of at least 24 months.
RESULTS: In the early post-operative stage, stems implanted transfemoral were associated with significantly lower Harris Hip Scores and a significantly more frequent appearance of Trendelenburg signs. The differences lessened at the end of the follow-up period. Within the group of transfemoral implantation, all six stems with a circular fixation zone measuring less than 3 cm had subsided and two of these had become loose; none of the stems with greater fixation zones exhibited these properties. In the case of the endofemoral implants, three stems exhibited sinking but there did not appear to be any relationship between this event and length of fixation zone.
CONCLUSION: The surgical approach has an association with the short-time outcomes of hip revsions using cementless modular stems. Transfemoral implantation of the "Revitan curved" stem requires a fixation zone of at least 3 cm and a longer period of rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18389264     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-008-0617-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  10 in total

1.  Revision arthroplasty in periprosthetic fractures of the proximal femur.

Authors:  B Fink
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 1.154

2.  Outcome of a modular tapered uncemented titanium femoral stem in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Maik Hoberg; Christian Konrads; Jana Engelien; Dorothee Oschmann; Michael Holder; Matthias Walcher; Maximilian Rudert
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Long, titanium, cemented stems decreased late periprosthetic fractures and revisions in patients with severe bone loss and previous revision.

Authors:  Philippe Hernigou; Hernigou Philippe; Nicolas Dupuys; Dupuys Nicolas; Jerome Delambre; Delambre Jerome; Isaac Guissou; Guissou Isaac; Alexandre Poignard; Poignard Alexandre; Jerome Allain; Allain Jerome; Charles Henri Flouzat Lachaniette
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  A biomechanical assessment of modular and monoblock revision hip implants using FE analysis and strain gage measurements.

Authors:  Habiba Bougherara; Rad Zdero; Suraj Shah; Milan Miric; Marcello Papini; Paul Zalzal; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 5.  [Revision hip arthroplastiy of the hip joint. Revision of the femur: which implant is indicated when?].

Authors:  A Gruner; K-D Heller
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Two-stage cementless revision of infected hip endoprostheses.

Authors:  Bernd Fink; Alexandra Grossmann; Martin Fuerst; Peter Schäfer; Lars Frommelt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Technical Note for Transfemoral Implantation of Tapered Revision Stems. The Advantage to Stay Short.

Authors:  Bernd Fink
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-04-24

8.  EBRA Migration Analysis of a Modular, Distally Fixed Stem in Hip Revision Arthroplasty: A Clinical and Radiological Study.

Authors:  Philipp Blum; David Putzer; Johannes Neugebauer; Markus Neubauer; Markus Süß; Dietmar Dammerer
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 4.964

9.  Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using a modular tapered, fluted titanium stem: 5- to 16-year results of 163 cases.

Authors:  Dieter C Wirtz; Sascha Gravius; Rudolf Ascherl; Miguel Thorweihe; Raimund Forst; Ulrich Noeth; Uwe M Maus; Matthias D Wimmer; Günther Zeiler; Moritz C Deml
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  What can the surgeon do to reduce the risk of junction breakage in modular revision stems?

Authors:  Bernd Fink
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2018-08-31
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.