BACKGROUND: Use of more than one health care system to obtain care is common among adults receiving care within the Veterans Affairs (VA) medical system. It is not known what effect using care from multiple sources has on the quality of care patients receive. OBJECTIVES: To examine whether use of recommended ambulatory care services differs between exclusive and dual VA users. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of the 2004 Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance System, a nationally-representative survey of community-dwelling adults aged 18 years or older. Our outcome measures were self-reported use of 18 recommended services for cancer prevention, cardiovascular risk reduction, diabetes management, and infectious disease prevention. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine the association between exclusive and dual VA use and use of recommended ambulatory services. RESULTS: There were 3470 exclusive VA users and 4523 dual VA users. Dual users were significantly more likely to be older and white, have higher incomes, have graduated from college, and be insured when compared with exclusive VA users. In unadjusted analyses, dual users received higher rates of recommended services. After adjustment for patient characteristics, use of recommended services was largely similar among exclusive and dual VA users. Exclusive VA users reported 14% greater use of breast cancer screening and 10% greater use of cholesterol monitoring among patients with hypercholesterolemia, and 6% lower use of prostate cancer screening and 7% lower use of influenza vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: After adjustment for patient characteristics, exclusive and dual VA users reported similar rates of recommended ambulatory service use.
BACKGROUND: Use of more than one health care system to obtain care is common among adults receiving care within the Veterans Affairs (VA) medical system. It is not known what effect using care from multiple sources has on the quality of care patients receive. OBJECTIVES: To examine whether use of recommended ambulatory care services differs between exclusive and dual VA users. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of the 2004 Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance System, a nationally-representative survey of community-dwelling adults aged 18 years or older. Our outcome measures were self-reported use of 18 recommended services for cancer prevention, cardiovascular risk reduction, diabetes management, and infectious disease prevention. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine the association between exclusive and dual VA use and use of recommended ambulatory services. RESULTS: There were 3470 exclusive VA users and 4523 dual VA users. Dual users were significantly more likely to be older and white, have higher incomes, have graduated from college, and be insured when compared with exclusive VA users. In unadjusted analyses, dual users received higher rates of recommended services. After adjustment for patient characteristics, use of recommended services was largely similar among exclusive and dual VA users. Exclusive VA users reported 14% greater use of breast cancer screening and 10% greater use of cholesterol monitoring among patients with hypercholesterolemia, and 6% lower use of prostate cancer screening and 7% lower use of influenza vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: After adjustment for patient characteristics, exclusive and dual VA users reported similar rates of recommended ambulatory service use.
Authors: Thomas R Radomski; Xinhua Zhao; Carolyn T Thorpe; Joshua M Thorpe; Chester B Good; Maria K Mor; Michael J Fine; Walid F Gellad Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Thomas R Radomski; Xinhua Zhao; Carolyn T Thorpe; Joshua M Thorpe; Jennifer G Naples; Maria K Mor; Chester B Good; Michael J Fine; Walid F Gellad Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Thomas Byrne; Richard E Nelson; Ann Elizabeth Montgomery; Emily Brignone; Adi V Gundlapalli; Jamison D Fargo Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Melissa R Partin; Amy A Gravely; James F Burgess; David A Haggstrom; Sarah E Lillie; David B Nelson; Sean M Nugent; Aasma Shaukat; Shahnaz Sultan; Louise C Walter; Diana J Burgess Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-05-11 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Chuan-Fen Liu; Michael Chapko; Chris L Bryson; James F Burgess; John C Fortney; Mark Perkins; Nancy D Sharp; Matthew L Maciejewski Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Chuan-Fen Liu; Cory Bolkan; Domin Chan; Elizabeth M Yano; Lisa V Rubenstein; Edmund F Chaney Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-12-20 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Joanne LaFleur; Adam P Bress; Lisa Rosenblatt; Jacob Crook; Paul E Sax; Joel Myers; Corey Ritchings Journal: AIDS Date: 2017-09-24 Impact factor: 4.177