Wing S Wong1, Richard Fielding. 1. Health Behavioral Research Group, Department of Community Medicine and Unit for Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction has been accorded increased importance in evaluating the quality of health care. However, only a few studies have examined factors associated with patient satisfaction in cancer populations, with no data currently available in Chinese oncology populations. OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine the longitudinal course of the relationship between patient satisfaction and quality of life (QoL) in Chinese cancer patients. METHODS: A total of 253 liver cancer patients and 334 lung cancer patients were assessed during their first outpatient visit (baseline) and at 2 follow-up interviews (FU1 and FU2). QoL was measured by the Chinese version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General Scale [FACT-G (Ch)]. Patient satisfaction was assessed by the Nine-Item Chinese Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (ChPSQ-9) and the cognitive subscale of the Medical Interview Satisfaction Scale (MISS-Cog). Linear mixed effects (LME) models were fitted to identify predictors of patient satisfaction and QoL. RESULTS: Results of LME analyses showed no significant between-group differences in psychosocial, satisfaction, and QoL measures over time (all P > 0.05). Age [beta = -0.001, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.03 to 0.00, P < 0.05] and optimism (beta = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.30, P < 0.001) predicted MISS-Cog and ChPSQ-9, respectively. After adjusting for sociodemographic and psychosocial variables, only ChPSQ-9 (beta = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.18, P < 0.001) predicted QoL scores. No significant association between MISS-Cog and QoL was found. CONCLUSIONS: General emotional support from health professionals (ChPSQ-9) was a more effective predictor of QoL than was a measure of informational support (MISS-Cog) among these patients. Because expectations of clinical care likely vary by culture, and nature and stage of disease, measures of patient satisfaction that address both informational and care expectations are important.
BACKGROUND:Patient satisfaction has been accorded increased importance in evaluating the quality of health care. However, only a few studies have examined factors associated with patient satisfaction in cancer populations, with no data currently available in Chinese oncology populations. OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine the longitudinal course of the relationship between patient satisfaction and quality of life (QoL) in Chinese cancerpatients. METHODS: A total of 253 liver cancerpatients and 334 lung cancerpatients were assessed during their first outpatient visit (baseline) and at 2 follow-up interviews (FU1 and FU2). QoL was measured by the Chinese version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General Scale [FACT-G (Ch)]. Patient satisfaction was assessed by the Nine-Item Chinese Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (ChPSQ-9) and the cognitive subscale of the Medical Interview Satisfaction Scale (MISS-Cog). Linear mixed effects (LME) models were fitted to identify predictors of patient satisfaction and QoL. RESULTS: Results of LME analyses showed no significant between-group differences in psychosocial, satisfaction, and QoL measures over time (all P > 0.05). Age [beta = -0.001, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.03 to 0.00, P < 0.05] and optimism (beta = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.30, P < 0.001) predicted MISS-Cog and ChPSQ-9, respectively. After adjusting for sociodemographic and psychosocial variables, only ChPSQ-9 (beta = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.18, P < 0.001) predicted QoL scores. No significant association between MISS-Cog and QoL was found. CONCLUSIONS: General emotional support from health professionals (ChPSQ-9) was a more effective predictor of QoL than was a measure of informational support (MISS-Cog) among these patients. Because expectations of clinical care likely vary by culture, and nature and stage of disease, measures of patient satisfaction that address both informational and care expectations are important.
Authors: Breffni Hannon; Nadia Swami; Monika K Krzyzanowska; Natasha Leighl; Gary Rodin; Lisa W Le; Camilla Zimmermann Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2013-02-23 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Bailey Howard; Ali Aneizi; Vidushan Nadarajah; Patrick M J Sajak; Dominic J Ventimiglia; Cameran I Burt; Min Zhan; Ngozi M Akabudike; R Frank Henn Journal: J Clin Orthop Trauma Date: 2020-06-27
Authors: Vincenzo O Palmieri; Daniela Santovito; Francesco Margari; Madia Lozupone; Francesco Minerva; Carla Di Gennaro; Orlando Todarello; Giuseppe Palasciano Journal: Clin Exp Med Date: 2013-12-10 Impact factor: 3.984
Authors: Jacqueline M Hartgerink; Jane M Cramm; Ton J Bakker; Johan P Mackenbach; Anna P Nieboer Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2015-08-08 Impact factor: 2.655