Literature DB >> 18388579

Influence of injury characteristics and payer status on burn treatment location in Washington state.

Matthew B Klein1, Christopher D Mack, C Bradley Kramer, David M Heimbach, Nicole S Gibran, Frederick P Rivara.   

Abstract

The provision of optimal burn care is a resource-intensive endeavor. The American Burn Association has developed criteria to help guide the decision to refer a patient to a burn center for definitive injury care. The purpose of this study was to compare the patient and injury characteristics of patients admitted to the single verified burn center in Washington State with those treated at other facilities in the state. We performed a retrospective review of all patients admitted to a hospital with a burn injury in Washington State from 1987 to 2005 using the state's discharge database (Comprehensive Hospital Abstract Reporting System). Patient and injury factors of patients admitted to the state's single verified burn center or at other hospitals were compared. Multivariate poisson regression was used to calculate the relative risk of injury and patient factors that were significantly associated with admission to the verified burn center. From 1987 to 2005, a total of 16,531 patients were admitted to a Washington State hospital after burn injury. Of these patients, 8624 (52.2%) were treated definitively at the University of Washington Burn Center. Patients treated at this verified center had larger overall burn size (7.4% vs 4.5% TBSA, P < .001), higher percent full-thickness burn (4.3% vs 1.2%, P < .001), and higher rates of inhalation injury (2.3% vs 1.5%, P = .005). Uninsured status (relative risk = 1.46, 95% confidence interval = 1.4-1.5) was also significantly associated with treatment at the verified burn center. Injury severity and payer status were both found to be independent predictors of treatment at the single verified burn center in Washington.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18388579      PMCID: PMC3042356          DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181710846

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Burn Care Res        ISSN: 1559-047X            Impact factor:   1.845


  16 in total

Review 1.  The importance of the normality assumption in large public health data sets.

Authors:  Thomas Lumley; Paula Diehr; Scott Emerson; Lu Chen
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2001-10-25       Impact factor: 21.981

2.  A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data.

Authors:  Guangyong Zou
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  What do we do with missing data? Some options for analysis of incomplete data.

Authors:  Trivellore E Raghunathan
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 21.981

4.  An outcome analysis of patients transferred to a regional burn center: transfer status does not impact survival.

Authors:  Matthew B Klein; Avery B Nathens; David M Heimbach; Nicole S Gibran
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 2.744

5.  An analysis of the long-distance transport of burn patients to a regional burn center.

Authors:  Matthew B Klein; Avery B Nathens; Dominic Emerson; David M Heimbach; Nicole S Gibran
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.845

6.  The effect of payer status on utilization of hospital resources in trauma care.

Authors:  P M Rhee; D Grossman; F Rivara; C Mock; G Jurkovich; R V Maier
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1997-04

7.  Comparison of burn size estimates between prehospital reports and burn center evaluations.

Authors:  B L Berkebile; I W Goldfarb; H Slater
Journal:  J Burn Care Rehabil       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct

8.  The development of burn centers in North America.

Authors:  A R Dimick; P A Brigham; E M Sheehy
Journal:  J Burn Care Rehabil       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr

9.  Acutely injured patients with trauma in Massachusetts: differences in care and mortality, by insurance status.

Authors:  J S Haas; L Goldman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Problems associated with transfer of patients to a regional burns unit.

Authors:  J H Palmer; A B Sutherland
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 2.586

View more
  5 in total

1.  Benefits of an outreach education coordinator: a burn center's experience.

Authors:  K A Hollowed; T E Travis; M H Jordan; J W Shupp
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2015-12-31

2.  Inter-facility transfer of pediatric burn patients from U.S. Emergency Departments.

Authors:  Sarah A Johnson; Junxin Shi; Jonathan I Groner; Rajan K Thakkar; Renata Fabia; Gail E Besner; Huiyun Xiang; Krista K Wheeler
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 2.744

3.  Verified centers, nonverified centers, or other facilities: a national analysis of burn patient treatment location.

Authors:  David Zonies; Christopher Mack; Bradley Kramer; Frederick Rivara; Matthew Klein
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Necrotizing soft-tissue infections: differences in patients treated at burn centers and non-burn centers.

Authors:  Frederick W Endorf; Matthew B Klein; Christopher D Mack; Gregory J Jurkovich; Frederick P Rivara
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.845

5.  Burn related injuries: a nationwide analysis of adult inter-facility transfers over a six-year period in the United States.

Authors:  Christopher S Evans; Kimberly Hart; Wesley H Self; Sayeh Nikpay; Callie M Thompson; Michael J Ward
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2022-08-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.