Literature DB >> 18388306

Regulation of self-renewal and pluripotency by Sox2 in human embryonic stem cells.

Helen Fong1, Kristi A Hohenstein, Peter J Donovan.   

Abstract

Human embryonic stem (hES) cells, derived from blastocysts, are capable of unlimited self-renewal and differentiation into all cell lineages of the body. Because of their pluripotent nature, hES cells are valuable tools for understanding human development and advancing the field of regenerative medicine. However, one key to harnessing the therapeutic power of hES cells for biomedical applications begins with determining how these cells maintain their pluripotent and undifferentiated state. Studies in mice have implicated three factors in regulating pluripotency in embryonic stem cells, Oct4, Nanog, and Sox2. However, significant differences in growth regulation between mouse embryonic stem and hES cells have been identified, suggesting a need to determine when and how factors work in hES cells. To date, the transcription factors Oct4 and Nanog have been identified as critical regulators of stem cell fate by functional studies in hES cells. To determine the role of Sox2 in maintaining hES cell pluripotency and self-renewal, we used RNA interference to specifically knock down Sox2 gene expression. Reduction of Sox2 expression in hES cells results in loss of the undifferentiated stem cell state, as indicated by a change in cell morphology, altered stem cell marker expression, and increased expression of trophectoderm markers. In addition, knockdown of Sox2 results in reduced expression of several key stem cell factors, including Oct4 and Nanog, linking these three factors together in a pluripotent regulatory network. Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18388306     DOI: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-1002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cells        ISSN: 1066-5099            Impact factor:   6.277


  114 in total

Review 1.  Potential therapeutic implications of cancer stem cells in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Lin Cheng; Shideng Bao; Jeremy N Rich
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 5.858

2.  Sex-determining region Y-box 2 expression predicts poor prognosis in human ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Doo Young Chang; Imelda Mercado-Uribe; Jinsong Liu
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 3.466

3.  Rare cell proteomic reactor applied to stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC)-based quantitative proteomics study of human embryonic stem cell differentiation.

Authors:  Ruijun Tian; Shuai Wang; Fred Elisma; Li Li; Hu Zhou; Lisheng Wang; Daniel Figeys
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  Comprehensive profiling reveals mechanisms of SOX2-mediated cell fate specification in human ESCs and NPCs.

Authors:  Chenlin Zhou; Xiaoqin Yang; Yiyang Sun; Hongyao Yu; Yong Zhang; Ying Jin
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 25.617

5.  Expression of microRNA 638 and sex-determining region Y-box 2 in hepatocellular carcinoma: Association between clinicopathological features and prognosis.

Authors:  Weikang Ye; Jieke Li; Guan Fang; Xiupeng Cai; Yan Zhang; Chaojun Zhou; Lei Chen; Wenjun Yang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 6.  Pluripotent stem cell lines.

Authors:  Junying Yu; James A Thomson
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 7.  Concise review: the involvement of SOX2 in direct reprogramming of induced neural stem/precursor cells.

Authors:  Christof Maucksch; Kathryn S Jones; Bronwen Connor
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 6.940

8.  SOX2-silenced squamous cell carcinoma: a highly malignant form of esophageal cancer with SOX2 promoter hypermethylation.

Authors:  Ritsuko Maehara; Kohei Fujikura; Kengo Takeuchi; Masayuki Akita; Shiho Abe-Suzuki; Jana Karbanová; Denis Corbeil; Tomoo Itoh; Yoshihiro Kakeji; Yoh Zen
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 7.842

9.  Lineage Plasticity in Cancer Progression and Treatment.

Authors:  Clémentine Le Magnen; Michael M Shen; Cory Abate-Shen
Journal:  Annu Rev Cancer Biol       Date:  2017-12-01

10.  Cathepsin B and uPAR regulate self-renewal of glioma-initiating cells through GLI-regulated Sox2 and Bmi1 expression.

Authors:  Sreelatha Gopinath; Ramarao Malla; Kiranmai Alapati; Bharathi Gorantla; Meena Gujrati; Dzung H Dinh; Jasti S Rao
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 4.944

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.