Literature DB >> 18387731

Laser fibre deterioration and loss of power output during photo-selective 80-w potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vaporisation of the prostate.

Thomas Hermanns1, Tullio Sulser, Markus Fatzer, Martin K Baumgartner, Julien M Rey, Markus W Sigrist, Hans-Helge Seifert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The potassium-titanyl-phosphate (KTP) laser technique for photo-selective vaporisation of the prostate (PVP) has been regularly improved over the last decade. Nonetheless, decreasing efficiency of tissue vaporisation during the course of the operation and macroscopic alterations of the laser fibre's tip are regularly observed and seem to affect the outcome of this procedure.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the course of power output and to determine the type and extent of fibre deterioration during PVP. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Forty laser fibres were investigated during PVP in 35 consecutive patients with prostatic bladder outflow obstruction between January 2007 and August 2007 in a university hospital. INTERVENTION: All patients underwent PVP performed by three different surgeons using the 80-W KTP laser. MEASUREMENTS: Power output was measured at the beginning and regularly throughout PVP and throughout in vitro vaporisation without fibre-tissue contact. Microscopic documentation of the fibre tip was performed after the procedure. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Carbonisation and melting of the fibre tip was regularly visible and appeared to be more pronounced as more energy was applied. Additionally, 90% of the fibres showed a significant decrease of power output during PVP, resulting in an end-of-lifespan (ie, 275-kilojoule) median power output of 20% of the initial value. Final median power output after in vitro vaporisation was 83% of the starting value. The extent of the structural and functional changes might only be valid for the operative technique performed in this investigation.
CONCLUSIONS: Fibre deterioration caused significant reduction of power output during PVP. This finding is an explanation for the often observed decreasing efficiency of tissue ablation and may also be responsible for some of the typical drawbacks and complications of PVP. Hence, improvements in fibre quality are necessary to advance the efficiency of this technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18387731     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.03.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  11 in total

1.  Absorption of irrigation fluid during XPS™ GreenLight laser vaporization of the prostate: results from a prospective breath ethanol monitoring study.

Authors:  Marian S Wettstein; Cédric Poyet; Nico C Grossmann; Christian D Fankhauser; Etienne X Keller; Marko Kozomara; Salome Meyer; Tullio Sulser; Alexander Müller; Thomas Hermanns
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-01-16       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  [GreenLight laser vaporisation of the prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Development and significance].

Authors:  H-H Seifert; T Hermanns; T Sulser
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Ablative efficiency of 532-nm laser vaporization compared to transurethral resection of the prostate: results from a prospective three-dimensional ultrasound volumetry study.

Authors:  Thomas Hermanns; Oliver Gross; Benedikt Kranzbühler; Lukas J Hefermehl; Cédric Poyet; Alexander Müller; Stanley A Yap; Maurice S Michel; Daniel Eberli; Michael Müntener; Matthias Zimmermann; Tullio Sulser; Hans-Helge Seifert
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Photoselective Vaporesection of the Prostate via an End-firing Lithium Triborate Crystal Laser.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Yao-Guang Zhang; Sheng-Cai Zhu; Ben Wan; Ming Liu; Jian-Ye Wang
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  The 532-nm 180-W (GreenLight®) laser vaporization of the prostate for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms: how durable is the new side-fire fiber with integrated cooling system?

Authors:  Claus Brunken; Maximilian Munsch; Stephan Tauber; Rainer Schmidt; Christian Seitz
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.161

6.  Laser prostatectomy: holmium laser enucleation and photoselective laser vaporization of the prostate.

Authors:  Yakup Bostanci; Amir Kazzazi; Bob Djavan
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2013

7.  Optical feedback-induced light modulation for fiber-based laser ablation.

Authors:  Hyun Wook Kang
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.161

8.  Investigation on safety aspects of forward light propagation during laser surgery.

Authors:  Hyun Wook Kang; Jeehyun Kim; Junghwan Oh
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 3.161

9.  Is loss of power output due to laser fiber degradation still an issue during prostate vaporization using the 180 W GreenLight XPS laser?

Authors:  Thomas Hermanns; Nico C Grossmann; Marian S Wettstein; Etienne X Keller; Christian D Fankhauser; Oliver Gross; Benedikt Kranzbühler; Martin Lüscher; Alexander H Meier; Tullio Sulser; Cédric Poyet
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Change in storage symptoms following laser prostatectomy: comparison between photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP).

Authors:  Min Chul Cho; Seung Beom Ha; Seung-June Oh; Soo Woong Kim; Jae-Seung Paick
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.