Literature DB >> 18387700

Out-of-hospital continuous positive airway pressure ventilation versus usual care in acute respiratory failure: a randomized controlled trial.

James Thompson1, David A Petrie, Stacy Ackroyd-Stolarz, Darrell J Bardua.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Continuous positive airway pressure ventilation (CPAP) in appropriately selected patients with acute respiratory failure has been shown to reduce the need for tracheal intubation in hospital. Despite several case series, the effectiveness of out-of-hospital CPAP has not been rigorously studied. We performed a prospective, randomized, nonblinded, controlled trial to determine whether patients in severe respiratory distress treated with CPAP in the out-of-hospital setting have lower overall tracheal intubation rates than those treated with usual care.
METHODS: Out-of-hospital patients in severe respiratory distress, with failing respiratory efforts, were eligible for the study. The study was approved under exception to informed consent guidelines. Patients were randomized to receive either usual care, including conventional medications plus oxygen by facemask, bag-valve-mask ventilation, or tracheal intubation, or conventional medications plus out-of-hospital CPAP. The primary outcome was need for tracheal intubation during the out-of-hospital/hospital episode of care. Mortality and length of stay were secondary outcomes of interest.
RESULTS: In total, 71 patients were enrolled into the study, with 1 patient in each group lost to follow-up after refusing full consent. There were no important differences in baseline physiologic parameters, out-of-hospital scene times, or emergency department diagnosis between groups. In the usual care group, 17 of 34 (50%) patients were intubated versus 7 of 35 (20%) in the CPAP group (unadjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09 to 0.73; adjusted OR 0.16; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.7; number needed to treat 3; 95% CI 2 to 12). Mortality was 12 of 34 (35.3%) in the usual care versus 5 of 35 (14.3%) in the CPAP group (unadjusted OR 0.3; 95% CI 0.09 to 0.99).
CONCLUSION: Paramedics can be trained to use CPAP for patients in severe respiratory failure. There was an absolute reduction in tracheal intubation rate of 30% and an absolute reduction in mortality of 21% in appropriately selected out-of-hospital patients who received CPAP instead of usual care. Larger, multicenter studies are recommended to confirm this observed benefit seen in this relatively small trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18387700     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  13 in total

1.  CPAP for acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema from out-of-hospital to cardiac intensive care unit: a randomised multicentre study.

Authors:  Laurent Ducros; Damien Logeart; Eric Vicaut; Patrick Henry; Patrick Plaisance; Jean-Philippe Collet; Claire Broche; Papa Gueye; Muriel Vergne; David Goetgheber; Pierre-Yves Pennec; Vanessa Belpomme; Jean-Michel Tartière; Sophie Lagarde; Marius Placente; Marie-Laurence Fievet; Gilles Montalescot; Didier Payen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Medical conditions associated with out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation.

Authors:  Henry E Wang; G K Balasubramani; Lawrence J Cook; Donald M Yealy; Judith R Lave
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2011 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.077

Review 3.  Official ERS/ATS clinical practice guidelines: noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure.

Authors:  Bram Rochwerg; Laurent Brochard; Mark W Elliott; Dean Hess; Nicholas S Hill; Stefano Nava; Paolo Navalesi; Massimo Antonelli; Jan Brozek; Giorgio Conti; Miquel Ferrer; Kalpalatha Guntupalli; Samir Jaber; Sean Keenan; Jordi Mancebo; Sangeeta Mehta; Suhail Raoof
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 16.671

4.  An observational study of the utility of continuous positive airway pressure ventilation for appropriate candidates in prehospital care in the Midwest region.

Authors:  C Mac Donncha; N Cummins; D Hennelly; A Hannigan; D Ryan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 5.  Non-invasive ventilation in cardiogenic pulmonary edema.

Authors:  Giuseppe Bello; Paolo De Santis; Massimo Antonelli
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-09

6.  Out-of-hospital noninvasive ventilation: epidemiology, technology and equipment.

Authors:  John Scott Baird; Thyyar M Ravindranath
Journal:  Pediatr Rep       Date:  2012-04-24

7.  Pre- and in-hospital non-invasive ventilation.

Authors:  E De Robertis; M Iannuzzi; R Tufano; O Piazza
Journal:  Transl Med UniSa       Date:  2011-10-17

Review 8.  Continuous positive airway pressure and noninvasive ventilation in prehospital treatment of patients with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review of controlled studies.

Authors:  Skule A Bakke; Morten T Botker; Ingunn S Riddervold; Hans Kirkegaard; Erika F Christensen
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Prehospital treatment with continuous positive airway pressure in patients with acute respiratory failure: a regional observational study.

Authors:  Vibe Maria Laden Nielsen; Jacob Madsen; Anette Aasen; Anne Pernille Toft-Petersen; Kenneth Lübcke; Bodil Steen Rasmussen; Erika Frischknecht Christensen
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 10.  Management of critically ill patients receiving noninvasive and invasive mechanical ventilation in the emergency department.

Authors:  Louise Rose
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2012-03-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.