Literature DB >> 18387680

Responses of chronically contaminated biofilms to short pulses of diuron. An experimental study simulating flooding events in a small river.

Ahmed Tlili1, Ursula Dorigo, Bernard Montuelle, Christelle Margoum, Nadia Carluer, Véronique Gouy, Agnès Bouchez, Annette Bérard.   

Abstract

An experimental study was undertaken to highlight the potential ecotoxicological impact of the herbicide diuron on biofilms during flooding events in a small river (Morcille) in the Beaujolais vineyard area (France). We investigated the responses of chronically contaminated biofilms exposed to short-term pulses (3 h) of diuron. Biofilms were grown in indoor microcosms that were either non-contaminated or exposed to low-level chronic contamination, and not exposed, or exposed to single or double pulses of two environmental concentrations (7 and 14 microg L(-1)) of diuron. Exposure to pollution and its impact on biofilms were assessed by measuring pesticide concentrations in biofilms, biomass parameters (chl a, AFDW), community structure (using 18S and 16S rDNA gene analysis by DGGE, and HPLC pigment analysis to target eukaryotes, bacteria and photoautotrophs, respectively) and by performing a physiological test. Control biofilms displayed very low diuron concentrations, whereas the herbicide was found in the contaminated biofilms. Nevertheless, diuron concentrations were not higher in the pulsed biofilms than in the non-pulsed ones. AFDW and chl ain vivo fluorescence increased in both microcosms during the experiment and biomass was higher in chronically exposed biofilms than in control ones. The impact on biomass was higher for the control double-pulsed biofilms than for the non-pulsed ones. Carbon incorporation by the chronically exposed biofilms was greater during the first 28 days of growth than during the first 28 days of growth in the control biofilms. Both single and double pulses inhibited carbon incorporation of all biofilm communities, especially of the control ones. Short-term inhibition of photosynthesis was never significantly different in exposed and non-exposed biofilms. Few differences in the pigment structure were found between chronically exposed and control biofilms, but pulses impacted on the pigment structure of all biofilm communities. Bacterial structural differences were observed between single-pulsed and non-pulsed biofilms, but not between double-pulsed and non-pulsed biofilms. The different pulses affected the eukaryotic community structures of the control biofilms, but not of the chronically exposed ones. Unlike the bacterial communities, the control eukaryotic communities were structurally different from the chronically exposed ones. This preliminary experimental study indicates that exposure to environmental concentrations of diuron and other agricultural contaminants and further exposure to diuron can have measurable effects on small river biofilm communities. The effects of a pulsed acute exposure to diuron on biofilms depended on whether the biofilms had previously been exposed to the same stressors or not.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18387680     DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2008.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aquat Toxicol        ISSN: 0166-445X            Impact factor:   4.964


  8 in total

1.  Comparative responses of river biofilms at the community level to common organic solvent and herbicide exposure.

Authors:  A Paule; V Roubeix; G D W Swerhone; J Roy; B Lauga; R Duran; F Delmas; E Paul; J L Rols; J R Lawrence
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Assessing sensitivity and recovery of field-collected periphyton acutely exposed to atrazine using PSII inhibition under laboratory conditions.

Authors:  Ryan S Prosser; Richard A Brain; Alan J Hosmer; Keith R Solomon; Mark L Hanson
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  In situ spatio-temporal changes in pollution-induced community tolerance to zinc in autotrophic and heterotrophic biofilm communities.

Authors:  Ahmed Tlili; Natalia Corcoll; Berta Bonet; Soizic Morin; Bernard Montuelle; Annette Bérard; Helena Guasch
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Biofilms as potential indicators of macrophyte-dominated lake health.

Authors:  Muyuan Ma; Jingling Liu; Xuemei Wang
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Influence of the natural growth environment on the sensitivity of phototrophic biofilm to herbicide.

Authors:  A Paule; A Lamy; V Roubeix; F Delmas; J L Rols
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Diuron tolerance and potential degradation by pelagic microbiomes in the Great Barrier Reef lagoon.

Authors:  Florent E Angly; Olga Pantos; Thomas C Morgan; Virginia Rich; Hemerson Tonin; David G Bourne; Philip Mercurio; Andrew P Negri; Gene W Tyson
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 7.  Improving Toxicity Assessment of Pesticide Mixtures: The Use of Polar Passive Sampling Devices Extracts in Microalgae Toxicity Tests.

Authors:  Sandra Kim Tiam; Vincent Fauvelle; Soizic Morin; Nicolas Mazzella
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Fullerenes Influence the Toxicity of Organic Micro-Contaminants to River Biofilms.

Authors:  Anna Freixa; Vicenç Acuña; Marina Gutierrez; Josep Sanchís; Lúcia H M L M Santos; Sara Rodriguez-Mozaz; Marinella Farré; Damià Barceló; Sergi Sabater
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 5.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.