Literature DB >> 18387593

Muscle imaging: mapping responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation with high-density surface electromyography.

Gijs van Elswijk1, Bert U Kleine, Sebastiaan Overeem, Bertine Eshuis, Karin D Hekkert, Dick F Stegeman.   

Abstract

Representations of different body parts or muscles in the human primary motor cortex overlap extensively. At the effector level, most muscles are surrounded by and overlap with several neighbours as well. This hampers the assessment of excitability in individual muscles with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), even if so-called "focal" stimulating coils are used. Here we used a novel mapping paradigm based on high-density surface electromyography (HD-sEMG) to investigate the spatial selectivity of TMS in the forearm musculature. In addition, we tested the hypothesis that selective stimulation can be improved by a voluntary background contraction of the target muscle. We mapped and compared the topographies of motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes during rest and during background contractions of two forearm muscles (extensor carpi radialis and extensor digitorum communis). The MEP topographies were also compared to the amplitude topography of voluntary EMG. The results indicate that under many conditions a large proportion of the MEP activity recorded at the surface originated from the target muscle's neighbours. There was a systematic relationship between TMS intensity and the topographic distribution of MEP responses during voluntary contraction. With increasing stimulus intensity, the MEP topography deviated increasingly more from the topography of voluntary EMG. We conclude that when standard EMG montages are used, the recorded MEPs are not necessarily evoked in the target muscle alone. Stimulation during a voluntary background contraction of the target muscle may enhance the selectivity of TMS. It however remains essential to use stimulus intensities as low as possible, to minimize the contribution of surrounding non-target muscles to the MEP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18387593     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  7 in total

1.  Corticospinal responses of quadriceps are abnormally coupled with hip adductors in chronic stroke survivors.

Authors:  Chandramouli Krishnan; Yasin Dhaher
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 5.330

2.  Electrical bioimpedance measurement as a tool for dysphagia visualisation.

Authors:  Chris J Chester; Paul T Gaynor; Richard D Jones; Maggie-Lee Huckabee
Journal:  Healthc Technol Lett       Date:  2014-09-25

3.  Using transcranial magnetic stimulation to map the cortical representation of lower-limb muscles.

Authors:  Jennifer L Davies
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2020-04-29

4.  Characterization of Forearm Muscle Activation in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy via High-Density Electromyography: A Case Study on the Implications for Myoelectric Control.

Authors:  Kostas Nizamis; Noortje H M Rijken; Robbert van Middelaar; João Neto; Bart F J M Koopman; Massimo Sartori
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  Human myoelectric spatial patterns differ among lower limb muscles and locomotion speeds.

Authors:  Bryan R Schlink; Andrew D Nordin; Daniel P Ferris
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2020-12

6.  Spatial localization of electromyographic amplitude distributions associated to the activation of dorsal forearm muscles.

Authors:  Alessio Gallina; Alberto Botter
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Can the Recording of Motor Potentials Evoked by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Be Optimized?

Authors:  Marco A C Garcia; Victor H Souza; Claudia D Vargas
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.