Literature DB >> 18387590

Fast responders have blinders on: ERP correlates of response inhibition in competition.

Ellen R A de Bruijn1, Stephan F Miedl, Harold Bekkering.   

Abstract

Recent studies have demonstrated that individuals acting in a social context form shared representations, resulting in incorporating another person's action plan into their own. The present study investigated the extent to which shared representations are formed in a competitive task. Specifically, it was tested whether in competition the process of response inhibition is affected by explicit knowledge of another's task. Event-related potential (ERP) correlates of response inhibition were measured while pairs of participants competed with each other on a speeded go/no-go task. Participants were instructed to always try to respond faster than their direct competitor. No-go stimuli requiring an inhibitory response of the other person as well (compatible action) or no-go stimuli to which the other person should respond (incompatible action) were directly compared. Behavioral performance measures and response inhibition, as reflected in the no-go P3, were decreased on incompatible actions compared to compatible ones. Interestingly, both the behavioral and the ERP effects were caused by the slow responding and thus unsuccessful competitors. These findings indicate that shared representations are formed in competitive tasks, but differently for successful and unsuccessful competitors. Only the slow responders are impeded by incompatible actions. The present study therefore demonstrates that the formation of shared representations is not a fully automatic process. People can differ in the extent to which they incorporate the other's action plan into their own and this may be closely related to successful performance in competitive action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18387590     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  16 in total

1.  Interpersonal memory-based guidance of attention is reduced for ingroup members.

Authors:  Xun He; Anne G Lever; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Bimanual joint action: correlated timing or "bimanual" movements accomplished by two people.

Authors:  Melanie Y Lam; Jarrod Blinch; Elizabeth M Connors; Jon B Doan; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  EEG correlates of impaired self-other integration during joint-task performance in schizophrenia.

Authors:  J de la Asuncion; C Bervoets; M Morrens; B Sabbe; E R A De Bruijn
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 4.  Predictive joint-action model: A hierarchical predictive approach to human cooperation.

Authors:  Ana Pesquita; Robert L Whitwell; James T Enns
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

5.  A large scale (N=102) functional neuroimaging study of error processing in a Go/NoGo task.

Authors:  Vaughn R Steele; Eric D Claus; Eyal Aharoni; Carla Harenski; Vince D Calhoun; Godfrey Pearlson; Kent A Kiehl
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  The mere presence of an outgroup member disrupts the brain's feedback-monitoring system.

Authors:  Nicholas M Hobson; Michael Inzlicht
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Higher-order action planning for individual and joint object manipulations.

Authors:  Marlene Meyer; Robrecht P R D van der Wel; Sabine Hunnius
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The joint flanker effect: sharing tasks with real and imagined co-actors.

Authors:  Silke Atmaca; Natalie Sebanz; Günther Knoblich
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  How a co-actor's task affects monitoring of own errors: evidence from a social event-related potential study.

Authors:  Ellen R A de Bruijn; Stephan F Miedl; Harold Bekkering
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  A large scale (N=102) functional neuroimaging study of response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task.

Authors:  Vaughn R Steele; Eyal Aharoni; Gillian E Munro; Vince D Calhoun; Prashanth Nyalakanti; Michael C Stevens; Godfrey Pearlson; Kent A Kiehl
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.