Literature DB >> 18387386

Role of laparoscopic stone surgery.

Rahul A Desai1, Dean G Assimos.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To define the role of laparoscopic stone surgery in current urologic practice.
METHODS: All cases of laparoscopic surgery for renal calculus disease performed at a single institution during a 2-year period were reviewed. A total of 449 stone-removing procedures were performed by one of us (D.G.A.) during this interval, of which 5 were laparoscopic (1.1%). Of the five laparoscopic procedures, three were pyelolithotomy/pyeloplasty, one was laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous nephrostolithotomy, and one was caliceal diverticular stone removal.
RESULTS: All 5 patients were rendered stone free, and no patient had perioperative complications.
CONCLUSIONS: A laparoscopic approach is rarely needed in patients requiring stone removal. However, it can be a safe and effective approach in the management of select patients with complex stone disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18387386     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.10.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  10 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic urinary stone surgery: an updated evidence-based review.

Authors:  Andreas Skolarikos; Athanasios G Papatsoris; Stefanos Albanis; Dean Assimos
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-04-16

2.  Obesity and Kidney Stone Procedures.

Authors:  Nikhi P Singh; Carter J Boyd; William Poore; Kyle Wood; Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2020

Review 3.  Ureteropelvic obstruction and renal stones: etiology and treatment.

Authors:  Andreas Skolarikos; Andreas Dellis; Thomas Knoll
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 4.  Comparison of laparoscopic stone surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of large upper urinary stones: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chenming Zhao; Huan Yang; Kun Tang; Ding Xia; Hua Xu; Zhiqiang Chen; Zhangqun Ye
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Comparative study of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of large renal pelvic stones.

Authors:  Yasser M Haggag; Gamal Morsy; Magdy M Badr; Abdel Baset A Al Emam; Mourad Farid; Mohamed Etafy
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus extra corporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for management of renal stones.

Authors:  Jagdish Chander; Nikhil Gupta; Pawanindra Lal; Pawan Lal; Vinod K Ramteke
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.407

7.  Approach to kidney stones associated with ureteropelvic junction obstruction during laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Juan Gómez Rivas; Sergio Alonso Y Gregorio; Leslie Cuello Sánchez; Cristina de Castro Guerin; Angel Tabernero Gómez; Luis Hidalgo Togores; Jesús Javier de la Peña Barthel
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2014-01-27

8.  Laparoscopic stone surgery with the aid of flexible nephroscopy.

Authors:  Jae Hyun Jung; Sung Yong Cho; Chang Wook Jeong; Hyeon Jeong; Hwancheol Son; Seung Hyo Woo; Dae Kyung Kim; Sun-Ho Min; Seung-June Oh; Hyeon-Hoe Kim; Seung Bae Lee
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2014-07-11

9.  Role of laparoscopy in ureteropelvic junction obstruction with concomitant pathology: a case series study.

Authors:  Omar Fahmy; Abdel-Rahman El-Fayoumi; Georgios Gakis; Bastian Amend; Mohd Ghani Khairul-Asri; Arnulf Stenzl; Christian Schwentner
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2015-12-21

10.  Comparison of the outcomes of laparoscopic pyeloplasty with and without concomitant pyelolithotomy.

Authors:  Mustafa Kadihasanoglu; Ugur Yucetas; Emre Karabay; Erkan Sonmezay
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.050

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.