A Orlacchio1, F Bolacchi, M Angelico, A Mancini, V Cozzolino, M Cadioli, G Simonetti. 1. Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Imaging Molecolare, Radiologia Interventistica e Radioterapia, Policlinico Universitario Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, Rome, Italy. aorlacchio@uniroma2.it
Abstract
PURPOSE: Histology is the gold standard by which to diagnose and score hepatic fibrosis. Recently, it has been proposed that hepatic magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) could provide an accurate representation of the disease process. The aim of this study was to correlate the in vivo high-field (3-Tesla) (1)H MRS features of noncirrhotic chronic hepatitis C patients stratified according to the histopathological stages of fibrosis. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Six healthy controls and 23 patients with biopsy-proven precirrhotic hepatitic C virus (HCV)-related liver disease were included. The subdivision of patients into the histopathological stages of fibrosis was based on the Ishak fibrosis (F) scoring system: mild hepatitis (0< or =F< or =1), moderate (2< or =F< or =3) and severe hepatitis (4< or =F< or =5). For correlation analysis, the Spearman nonparametric test was used. Differences between groups were calculated with the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test. A p value <0.05 was considered significant. The particular metabolite content was evaluated in relative units (RU), according to the pattern metabolite/H(2)O=area of the metabolite x1,000/area of nonsuppressed water. RESULT: A significant statistical difference was observed between control vs. mild and moderate vs. severe disease severity in choline-containing compounds (CCC)/H(2)O ratios (p=0.0379 and p=0.0003) and in glutamine/glutamate (Glx)/H(2)O ratios (p=0.004 and p<0.0001), whereas a statistically significant difference in the lipid/H(2)O ratios was achieved only between control vs. moderate and between moderate vs. severe stages of disease (p=0.011 and p=0.0030). CONCLUSION: High-field (1)H MRS successfully differentiates between mild/moderate vs. severe stages of chronic hepatitis and can be considered a complement to most standard imaging protocols in the liver.
PURPOSE: Histology is the gold standard by which to diagnose and score hepatic fibrosis. Recently, it has been proposed that hepatic magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) could provide an accurate representation of the disease process. The aim of this study was to correlate the in vivo high-field (3-Tesla) (1)H MRS features of noncirrhotic chronic hepatitis Cpatients stratified according to the histopathological stages of fibrosis. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Six healthy controls and 23 patients with biopsy-proven precirrhotic hepatitic C virus (HCV)-related liver disease were included. The subdivision of patients into the histopathological stages of fibrosis was based on the Ishak fibrosis (F) scoring system: mild hepatitis (0< or =F< or =1), moderate (2< or =F< or =3) and severe hepatitis (4< or =F< or =5). For correlation analysis, the Spearman nonparametric test was used. Differences between groups were calculated with the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test. A p value <0.05 was considered significant. The particular metabolite content was evaluated in relative units (RU), according to the pattern metabolite/H(2)O=area of the metabolite x1,000/area of nonsuppressed water. RESULT: A significant statistical difference was observed between control vs. mild and moderate vs. severe disease severity in choline-containing compounds (CCC)/H(2)O ratios (p=0.0379 and p=0.0003) and in glutamine/glutamate (Glx)/H(2)O ratios (p=0.004 and p<0.0001), whereas a statistically significant difference in the lipid/H(2)O ratios was achieved only between control vs. moderate and between moderate vs. severe stages of disease (p=0.011 and p=0.0030). CONCLUSION: High-field (1)H MRS successfully differentiates between mild/moderate vs. severe stages of chronic hepatitis and can be considered a complement to most standard imaging protocols in the liver.
Authors: S G Cho; M Y Kim; H J Kim; Y S Kim; W Choi; S H Shin; K C Hong; Y B Kim; J H Lee; C H Suh Journal: Radiology Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: K Ishak; A Baptista; L Bianchi; F Callea; J De Groote; F Gudat; H Denk; V Desmet; G Korb; R N MacSween Journal: J Hepatol Date: 1995-06 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Adrian K P Lim; Nayna Patel; Gavin Hamilton; Joseph V Hajnal; Robert D Goldin; Simon D Taylor-Robinson Journal: Hepatology Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: P W Angus; R M Dixon; B Rajagopalan; N G Ryley; K J Simpson; T J Peters; D P Jewell; G K Radda Journal: Clin Sci (Lond) Date: 1990-01 Impact factor: 6.124
Authors: I J Cox; D K Menon; J Sargentoni; D J Bryant; A G Collins; G A Coutts; R A Iles; J D Bell; I S Benjamin; S Gilbey Journal: J Hepatol Date: 1992-03 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: D K Menon; J Sargentoni; S D Taylor-Robinson; J D Bell; I J Cox; D J Bryant; G A Coutts; K Rolles; A K Burroughs; M Y Morgan Journal: Hepatology Date: 1995-02 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Alexandra G Pershina; Vladimir V Ivanov; Lina V Efimova; Oleg B Shevelev; Sergey V Vtorushin; Tatjana V Perevozchikova; Alexey E Sazonov; Ludmila M Ogorodova Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2017-07-14