Literature DB >> 18385957

Anchorage efficacy of palatally-inserted miniscrews in molar distalization with a periodontally/miniscrew-anchored distal jet.

Gero Kinzinger1, Norbert Gülden, Faruk Yildizhan, Benita Hermanns-Sachweh, Peter Diedrich.   

Abstract

AIM: As a clinical pilot study using the skeletonized, periodontally/miniscrew-anchored Distal Jet appliance, this study aimed to verify the positional stability of the palatally-inserted paramedian miniscrews when subjected to loading for several months, hence to assess the efficacy of the supporting anchorage design. MATERIAL AND
METHOD: Sixteen miniscrews (8-9 mm in length, 1.6 mm in diameter, polished surface) were inserted in the anterior region of the palate at paramedian locations. Once they had been in place for 1 week, skeletonized Distal Jets for bilateral molar distalization were anchored to the first premolars and necks of the miniscrews using composite. The appliances' coil spring systems were activated to a distalization force of 200-240 cN. The miniscrews were processed histologically after minimally-invasive explantation.
RESULTS: Forces acting reciprocally on the anchorage unit result in significant anchorage loss in the palatally-inserted titanium miniscrews used for added anchorage support: we observed ventral movement in the vicinity of the miniscrew heads of 0.95+/-0.82 mm (the mean; p = 0.005), and extrusion of 0.21+/-0.28 mm (p = 0.040). In the process they tipped 2.65 degrees +/-6.23 degrees in relation to the palatal plane and 2.15 degrees +/-5.76 degrees in relation to the anterior cranial base. We observed no evidence of direct screw-to-bone contact in any of the explanted miniscrews.
CONCLUSIONS: Titanium miniscrews with a polished surface, 1.6 mm in diameter and 8-9 mm long, do not provide stationary anchorage in molar distalization with the periodontally/miniscrew-anchored Distal Jet. When subjected for several months to load from forces that act in reciprocity to the force systems occurring during molar distalization, they fail to remain completely stationary in position in the palatal locations in which they were inserted. However, the combined anchorage setup is sufficient, intraorally and regardless of patient compliance, to largely compensate for the mesially-acting forces that occur reciprocal to molar distalization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18385957     DOI: 10.1007/s00056-008-0736-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orofac Orthop        ISSN: 1434-5293            Impact factor:   1.938


  6 in total

1.  Effects of maxillary molar distalization with Zygoma-Gear Appliance.

Authors:  Metin Nur; Mehmet Bayram; Mevlut Celikoglu; Dogan Kilkis; Ali Alper Pampu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Clinical factors correlated with the success rate of miniscrews in orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Nikolaos Topouzelis; Phoebus Tsaousoglou
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 6.344

Review 3.  Systematic review of mini-implant displacement under orthodontic loading.

Authors:  Manuel Nienkemper; Jörg Handschel; Dieter Drescher
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 6.344

4.  Maxillary molar distalization with MGBM-system in class II malocclusion.

Authors:  Giuliano Maino; Lisa Mariani; Ida Bozzo; Giovanna Maino; Alberto Caprioglio
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2013-07

5.  Skeletal versus conventional intraoral anchorage for the treatment of class II malocclusion: dentoalveolar and skeletal effects.

Authors:  Lisa Mariani; Giuliano Maino; Alberto Caprioglio
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 2.750

6.  Additional intraoral radiographs may change the judgment regarding the final position of orthodontic mini-implants.

Authors:  Marina K Oba; Guido A Marañón-Vásquez; Fábio L Romano; Christiano Oliveira-Santos
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.