Literature DB >> 18385401

Preferences of acutely ill patients for participation in medical decision-making.

C Wilkinson1, M Khanji, P E Cotter, O Dunne, S T O'Keeffe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine patient preferences for information and for participation in decision-making, and the determinants of these preferences in patients recently admitted to an acute hospital.
DESIGN: Prospective questionnaire-based study.
SETTING: Medical wards of an acute teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and fifty-two consecutive acute medical inpatients, median age 74 years. MEASUREMENTS: Standardised assessment included abbreviated mental test and subjective measure of severity of illness. Patients' desire for information was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale, and their desire for a role in medical decision-making using the Degner Control of Preferences Scale.
RESULTS: Of the 152 patients, 93 (61%) favoured a passive approach to decision-making (either "leave all decisions to the doctor" or "doctor makes final decision but seriously considers my opinion." In contrast, 101 (66%) patients sought "very extensive" or "a lot" of information about their condition. No significant effects of age, sex, socio-economic group or severity of acute illness on desire for information or the Degner scale result were found. There was no agreement between patients' preferences on the Degner scale and their doctors' predictions of those preferences.
CONCLUSIONS: Acute medical inpatients want to receive a lot of information about their illness, but most prefer a relatively passive role in decision-making. The only way to determine individual patient preferences is to ask them; preferences cannot be predicted from clinical or sociodemographic data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18385401     DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2006.021378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care        ISSN: 1475-3898


  7 in total

1.  Venous access: the patient experience.

Authors:  Melissa Robinson-Reilly; Penny Paliadelis; Mary Cruickshank
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  The effect of tablet computers with a mobile patient portal application on hospitalized patients' knowledge and activation.

Authors:  Kevin J O'Leary; Mary E Lohman; Eckford Culver; Audrey Killarney; G Randy Smith; David M Liebovitz
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Shared Decision Making for Syncope in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial.

Authors:  Marc A Probst; Michelle P Lin; Jeremy J Sze; Erik P Hess; Maggie Breslin; Dominick L Frosch; Benjamin C Sun; Marie-Noelle Langan; Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy; Lynne D Richardson
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 3.451

4.  Are elderly people with co-morbidities involved adequately in medical decision making when hospitalised? A cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Anne W Ekdahl; Lars Andersson; Ann-Britt Wiréhn; Maria Friedrichsen
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 3.921

5.  Patient participation in patients with heart failure receiving structured home care--a prospective longitudinal study.

Authors:  Lena Näsström; Tiny Jaarsma; Ewa Idvall; Kristofer Årestedt; Anna Strömberg
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Communication patterns in the doctor-patient relationship: evaluating determinants associated with low paternalism in Mexico.

Authors:  Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce; Angelica Angeles-Llerenas; Rocío Rodríguez-Valentín; Luis Salvador-Carulla; Rosalinda Domínguez-Esponda; Claudia Iveth Astudillo-García; Eduardo Madrigal-de León; Gregorio Katz
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  Patient preference and satisfaction with their involvement in the selection of an anesthetic method for surgery.

Authors:  Sung Mi Hwang; Jae Jun Lee; Ji Su Jang; Gi Ho Gim; Min Chul Kim; So Young Lim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 2.153

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.