Literature DB >> 18384728

A screening method for prioritizing non-target invertebrates for improved biosafety testing of transgenic crops.

Jacqui H Todd1, Padmaja Ramankutty, Emma I Barraclough, Louise A Malone.   

Abstract

We have developed a screening method that can be used during the problem formulation phase of risk assessment to identify and prioritize non-target invertebrates for risk analysis with any transgenic plant. In previously published protocols for this task, five criteria predominated. These criteria have been combined by our method in a simple model which assesses: (1) the possible level of risk presented by the plant to each invertebrate species (through measurements of potential hazard and exposure, the two principal criteria); (2) the hypothetical environmental impact of this risk (determined by the currently known status of the species' population in the ecosystem and its potential resilience to environmental perturbations); (3) the estimated economic, social and cultural value of each species; and (4) the assessed ability to conduct tests with the species. The screening method uses information on each of these criteria entered into a specially designed database that was developed using Microsoft Access 2003. The database holds biological and ecological information for each non-target species, as well as information about the transgenic plant that is the subject of the risk assessment procedure. Each piece of information is then ranked on the basis of the value of the information to each criterion being measured. This ranking system is flexible, allowing the method to be easily adapted for use in any agro-ecosystem and with any plant modification. A model is then used to produce a Priority Ranking of Non-Target Invertebrates (PRONTI) score for each species, which in turn allows the species to be prioritized for risk assessment. As an example, the method was used to prioritize non-target invertebrates for risk assessment of a hypothetical introduction of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) Cry1Ac-expressing Pinus radiata trees into New Zealand.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18384728     DOI: 10.1051/ebr:2008003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Biosafety Res        ISSN: 1635-7922


  5 in total

1.  Occurrence and field densities of Coleoptera in the maize herb layer: implications for Environmental Risk Assessment of genetically modified Bt-maize.

Authors:  Stefan Rauschen; Frank Schaarschmidt; Achim Gathmann
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Establishing a system with Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera: Drosophilidae) to assess the non-target effects of gut-active insecticidal compounds.

Authors:  Simone Haller; Michael Meissle; Jörg Romeis
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  The cultivation of Bt corn producing Cry1Ac toxins does not adversely affect non-target arthropods.

Authors:  Yanyan Guo; Yanjie Feng; Yang Ge; Guillaume Tetreau; Xiaowen Chen; Xuehui Dong; Wangpeng Shi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Surrogate species selection for assessing potential adverse environmental impacts of genetically engineered insect-resistant plants on non-target organisms.

Authors:  Keri Carstens; Bonifacio Cayabyab; Adinda De Schrijver; Patricia G Gadaleta; Richard L Hellmich; Jörg Romeis; Nicholas Storer; Fernando H Valicente; Michael Wach
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 3.074

5.  Bt rice in China - focusing the nontarget risk assessment.

Authors:  Yunhe Li; Qingling Zhang; Qingsong Liu; Michael Meissle; Yan Yang; Yanan Wang; Hongxia Hua; Xiuping Chen; Yufa Peng; Jörg Romeis
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 9.803

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.