Literature DB >> 18384185

A robust P-value for treatment effect in meta-analysis with publication bias.

John B Copas1, Paul F Malley.   

Abstract

Publication bias is a major and intractable problem in meta-analysis. There have been several attempts in the literature to adapt methods to allow for such bias, but these are only possible if we are prepared to make strong assumptions about the underlying selection mechanism. We discuss the assumption that the probability that a paper is published may depend in some unspecified way on the P-value being claimed by that study. We suggest a new robust P-value for the overall treatment effect, which turns out to be closely related to the correlation of the associated radial plot. Properties of the method are discussed and illustrated in two examples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18384185     DOI: 10.1002/sim.3284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  9 in total

1.  Study factors influencing ventricular enlargement in schizophrenia: a 20 year follow-up meta-analysis.

Authors:  Angelo Sayo; Robin G Jennings; John Darrell Van Horn
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Quantifying, displaying and accounting for heterogeneity in the meta-analysis of RCTs using standard and generalised Q statistics.

Authors:  Jack Bowden; Jayne F Tierney; Andrew J Copas; Sarah Burdett
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 3.  Overstating the evidence: double counting in meta-analysis and related problems.

Authors:  Stephen J Senn
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 4.  Novel methods to deal with publication biases: secondary analysis of antidepressant trials in the FDA trial registry database and related journal publications.

Authors:  Santiago G Moreno; Alex J Sutton; Erick H Turner; Keith R Abrams; Nicola J Cooper; Tom M Palmer; A E Ades
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-08-07

5.  Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression.

Authors:  Jack Bowden; George Davey Smith; Stephen Burgess
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 7.196

6.  Residual disease after primary surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: expert elicitation exercise to explore opinions about potential impact of publication bias in a planned systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrew Bryant; Michael Grayling; Shaun Hiu; Ketankumar Gajjar; Eugenie Johnson; Ahmed Elattar; Luke Vale; Dawn Craig; Raj Naik
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 3.006

7.  Assessment of regression-based methods to adjust for publication bias through a comprehensive simulation study.

Authors:  Santiago G Moreno; Alex J Sutton; A E Ades; Tom D Stanley; Keith R Abrams; Jaime L Peters; Nicola J Cooper
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Improving the visualization, interpretation and analysis of two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization via the Radial plot and Radial regression.

Authors:  Jack Bowden; Wesley Spiller; Fabiola Del Greco M; Nuala Sheehan; John Thompson; Cosetta Minelli; George Davey Smith
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 9.  Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence, and prevention.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis; Marcus R Munafò; Paolo Fusar-Poli; Brian A Nosek; Sean P David
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 20.229

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.