Literature DB >> 1838336

Light damage in the rat retina: the effect of dietary deprivation of N-3 fatty acids on acute structural alterations.

R A Bush1, C E Remé, A Malnoë.   

Abstract

We investigated the effect of depleting membrane docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, 22:6n-3) content through dietary deprivation of n-3 fatty acids on the susceptibility of the photoreceptors and pigment epithelium cells to acute light-induced changes. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were raised throughout gestation, lactation and up to the age of 8 weeks on semi-purified diets containing either safflower oil (SFO, n-3 deficient diet) or soybean oil (SO) as the sole source of lipids. A third group was switched at weaning from safflower oil to soybean oil (SFO/SO). Rats were maintained on a 12 hr/12 hr light/dark cycle in which the light level at the front of the cages was 5-10 lx. Light damage was produced by exposing dark-adapted animals to diffuse white fluorescent light of 700-800 lx for 30 min followed by 90 min of darkness. In order to study recovery from light damage, additional groups of SFO and SO rats were returned to dim cyclic light for 27 hr following bright light exposure. DHA content in retinal phosphatidylethanolamine and phosphatidylcholine was 65-75% lower in rats fed SFO than in rats fed SO. The decrease was compensated for by an increase in 22:5n-6, the total content of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) being similar in both the SFO and SO groups. The SFO/SO rats had DHA levels similar to SO animals, but 22:5n-6 remained elevated resulting in a slightly higher level of total PUFA. Severe rod outer segment (ROS) membrane disruptions were seen following bright light exposure in rats on the SO and SFO/SO diets. The appearance of these disruptions did not change significantly during more than 24 hr in dim cyclic light. In contrast, there were virtually no acute ROS lesions in the SFO group. Furthermore, there was a strong light-elicited disk-shedding response in the SO rats but not in the other two groups. The pigment epithelium of the DHA deficient retinas showed a significantly greater accumulation of large lipid droplets in the dark-adapted state. Notably, whole retina rhodopsin levels were 15% higher in the SFO than in the SO group. These results indicate that depletion of retinal DHA reduces the susceptibility of the rod outer segments to acute light damage and at the same time may alter visual pigment photochemistry and other photoreceptor and pigment epithelium functions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1838336     DOI: 10.1016/0014-4835(91)90109-r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Eye Res        ISSN: 0014-4835            Impact factor:   3.467


  25 in total

Review 1.  DNA repair in photoreceptor survival.

Authors:  M Soledad Cortina; William C Gordon; Walter J Lukiw; Nicolas G Bazan
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.590

Review 2.  Retinal light toxicity.

Authors:  P N Youssef; N Sheibani; D M Albert
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  [In vivo imaging of retinal cell apoptosis following acute light exposure].

Authors:  S Schmitz-Valckenberg; L Guo; W Cheung; S E Moss; F W Fitzke; M F Cordeiro
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Light-induced exacerbation of retinal degeneration in a rat model of Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome.

Authors:  Dana K Vaughan; Neal S Peachey; Michael J Richards; Blake Buchan; Steven J Fliesler
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 3.467

Review 5.  Retinal light damage: mechanisms and protection.

Authors:  Daniel T Organisciak; Dana K Vaughan
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 21.198

6.  Structural and functional consequences of bright light exposure on the retina of neonatal rats.

Authors:  Sandrine Joly; Allison Lindsay Dorfman; Sylvain Chemtob; Hakima Moukhles; Pierre Lachapelle
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-09-19       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 7.  The role of docosahexaenoic acid in retinal function.

Authors:  B G Jeffrey; H S Weisinger; M Neuringer; D C Mitchell
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.880

8.  High levels of retinal docosahexaenoic acid do not protect photoreceptor degeneration in VPP transgenic mice.

Authors:  Feng Li; Lea D Marchette; Richard S Brush; Michael H Elliott; Kimberly R Davis; Ashley G Anderson; Robert E Anderson
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 2.367

9.  Light damage in Abca4 and Rpe65rd12 mice.

Authors:  Li Wu; Keiko Ueda; Taka Nagasaki; Janet R Sparrow
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  New retinal light damage QTL in mice with the light-sensitive RPE65 LEU variant.

Authors:  Michael Danciger; Jessica Lyon; Danielle Worrill; Sara Hoffman; Janis Lem; Charlotte E Reme; Andreas Wenzel; Christian Grimm
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.957

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.