| Literature DB >> 18383349 |
Yuan Liu1, Xiaozhong Jiang, Jiantao Huang, Yang Wu, Guodong Wang, Lei Jiang, Wai Li, Yunfu Zhao.
Abstract
The aim of this article is to compare the superficial venous drainage system versus dual venous drainage system of radial forearm free flaps (RFFF) and its impact on flap survival. A total of 136 consecutive patients undergoing RFFF reconstruction for oral and maxillofacial surgical defects were reviewed retrospectively. In group l, both the superficial and deep veins were anastomosed to the neck recipient veins. In group 2, only the superficial vein was used for anastomosis. There were no statistical differences in venous problems between two groups (6/68 in group 1 vs. 5/68 in group 2, P = 0.75). The flap survival rate was 98.5% (66/68 in group 1 vs. 68/68 in group 2, P = 0.15). Although there are many theoretical advantages to dual venous drainage system anastomoses, they seem not to impact on flap survival in our experience. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Microsurgery, 2008Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18383349 DOI: 10.1002/micr.20489
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microsurgery ISSN: 0738-1085 Impact factor: 2.425