Literature DB >> 18382499

Phase-error correction in digital holography.

Samuel T Thurman1, James R Fienup.   

Abstract

The quality of images computed from digital holograms or heterodyne array imaging is degraded by phase errors in the object and/or reference beams at the time of measurement. This paper describes computer simulations used to compare the performance of digital shearing laser interferometry and various sharpness metrics for the correction of such phase errors when imaging a diffuse object. These algorithms are intended for scenarios in which multiple holograms can be recorded with independent object speckle realizations and a static phase error. Algorithm performance is explored as a function of the number of available speckle realizations and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The performance of various sharpness metrics is examined in detail and is shown to vary widely. Under ideal conditions with >15 speckle realizations and high SNR, phase corrections better than lambda/50 root-mean-square (RMS) were obtained. Corrections better than lambda/10 RMS were obtained in the high SNR regime with as few as two speckle realizations and at object beam signal levels as low as 2.5 photons/speckle with six speckle realizations.

Year:  2008        PMID: 18382499     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.25.000983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  8 in total

1.  Computational adaptive optics for broadband optical interferometric tomography of biological tissue.

Authors:  Steven G Adie; Benedikt W Graf; Adeel Ahmad; P Scott Carney; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Anisotropic aberration correction using region of interest based digital adaptive optics in Fourier domain OCT.

Authors:  Abhishek Kumar; Tschackad Kamali; René Platzer; Angelika Unterhuber; Wolfgang Drexler; Rainer A Leitgeb
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Digital adaptive optics line-scanning confocal imaging system.

Authors:  Changgeng Liu; Myung K Kim
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  In-vivo digital wavefront sensing using swept source OCT.

Authors:  Abhishek Kumar; Lara M Wurster; Matthias Salas; Laurin Ginner; Wolfgang Drexler; Rainer A Leitgeb
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  Quantitative phase-contrast confocal microscope.

Authors:  Changgeng Liu; Stefano Marchesini; Myung K Kim
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  High-speed line-field confocal holographic microscope for quantitative phase imaging.

Authors:  Changgeng Liu; Sebastian Knitter; Zhilong Cong; Ikbal Sencan; Hui Cao; Michael A Choma
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Automated fast computational adaptive optics for optical coherence tomography based on a stochastic parallel gradient descent algorithm.

Authors:  Dan Zhu; Ruoyan Wang; Mantas Žurauskas; Paritosh Pande; Jinci Bi; Qun Yuan; Lingjie Wang; Zhishan Gao; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Aberration-free volumetric high-speed imaging of in vivo retina.

Authors:  Dierck Hillmann; Hendrik Spahr; Carola Hain; Helge Sudkamp; Gesa Franke; Clara Pfäffle; Christian Winter; Gereon Hüttmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.