OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prevalence of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene overexpression in breast cancer patients encountered in Hong Kong and the concordance of HER2 findings from primary immunohistochemistry assays and confirmatory in-situ hybridisation assays. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Department of Clinical Oncology in a public hospital in Hong Kong. PATIENTS: All patient referrals between July 2006 and June 2007 with newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer (for prevalence evaluation), and all patients treated at our unit with confirmatory in-situ hybridisation tests performed within the study period (for concordance evaluation). RESULTS: There were 272 consecutive breast cancer patients eligible for prevalence evaluation. The distribution for immunohistochemistry staining in 249 cases for scores 0, 1+, 2+, and 3+ were 99 (40%), 40 (16%), 58 (23%), and 52 (21%) respectively. In the remaining 23 patients, four and 19 breast cancers were unscored and reported by immunohistochemistry to be HER2-positive and -negative, respectively. The overall HER2 overexpression rate (3+ or reported as positive) was 21%. HER2 overexpression was associated with grade 3 histology (P<0.001) and negative hormonal receptor status (P<0.001). However, it was not associated with age (P=0.525), T-classification (P=0.740), N-classification (P=0.691), nor group stages (P=0.433). Of the 37 patients with confirmatory in-situ hybridisation tests performed, 10 (71%) of 14 with immunohistochemistry staining of 3+ and 1 (4%) of 23 with immunohistochemistry staining of 2+ were found to have HER2 gene amplification. CONCLUSIONS: More than 25% of HER2 overexpression identified by immunohistochemistry assays in this Hong Kong cohort could not be verified by confirmatory in-situ hybridisation assays. Compliance with the latest guidelines for HER2 testing should improve the future accuracy and concordance.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prevalence of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene overexpression in breast cancerpatients encountered in Hong Kong and the concordance of HER2 findings from primary immunohistochemistry assays and confirmatory in-situ hybridisation assays. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Department of Clinical Oncology in a public hospital in Hong Kong. PATIENTS: All patient referrals between July 2006 and June 2007 with newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer (for prevalence evaluation), and all patients treated at our unit with confirmatory in-situ hybridisation tests performed within the study period (for concordance evaluation). RESULTS: There were 272 consecutive breast cancerpatients eligible for prevalence evaluation. The distribution for immunohistochemistry staining in 249 cases for scores 0, 1+, 2+, and 3+ were 99 (40%), 40 (16%), 58 (23%), and 52 (21%) respectively. In the remaining 23 patients, four and 19 breast cancers were unscored and reported by immunohistochemistry to be HER2-positive and -negative, respectively. The overall HER2 overexpression rate (3+ or reported as positive) was 21%. HER2 overexpression was associated with grade 3 histology (P<0.001) and negative hormonal receptor status (P<0.001). However, it was not associated with age (P=0.525), T-classification (P=0.740), N-classification (P=0.691), nor group stages (P=0.433). Of the 37 patients with confirmatory in-situ hybridisation tests performed, 10 (71%) of 14 with immunohistochemistry staining of 3+ and 1 (4%) of 23 with immunohistochemistry staining of 2+ were found to have HER2 gene amplification. CONCLUSIONS: More than 25% of HER2 overexpression identified by immunohistochemistry assays in this Hong Kong cohort could not be verified by confirmatory in-situ hybridisation assays. Compliance with the latest guidelines for HER2 testing should improve the future accuracy and concordance.
Authors: Jan Harder; Oliver Waiz; Florian Otto; Michael Geissler; Manfred Olschewski; Brigitte Weinhold; Hubert E Blum; Annette Schmitt-Graeff; Oliver G Opitz Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2009-09-28 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Hisani N Horne; C R Beena Devi; Hyuna Sung; Tieng Swee Tang; Philip S Rosenberg; Stephen M Hewitt; Mark E Sherman; William F Anderson; Xiaohong R Yang Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2014-12-24 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: J Harder; G Ihorst; V Heinemann; R Hofheinz; M Moehler; P Buechler; G Kloeppel; C Röcken; M Bitzer; S Boeck; E Endlicher; A Reinacher-Schick; C Schmoor; M Geissler Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2012-02-28 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Joanne E Mortimer; Laura Kruper; Mary Cianfrocca; Sayeh Lavasani; Sariah Liu; Niki Tank-Patel; Mina Sedrak; Wade Smith; Daphne Stewart; James Waisman; Christina Yeon; Tina Wang; Yuan Yuan Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-06-24 Impact factor: 4.241