Literature DB >> 18381950

Pilot randomized phase II study of celecoxib in oral premalignant lesions.

Vassiliki A Papadimitrakopoulou1, William N William, Andrew J Dannenberg, Scott M Lippman, J Jack Lee, Frank G Ondrey, Douglas E Peterson, Lei Feng, Anthea Atwell, Adel K El-Naggar, Cherie-Ann Nathan, Joseph I Helman, Baoheng Du, Bevan Yueh, Jay O Boyle.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2)-specific inhibition suppresses carcinogenesis in preclinical models and is a promising strategy for preventing oral cancer. In this pilot randomized phase II study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of the COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib in patients with oral premalignant lesions (OPL). EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Patients were randomly assigned to placebo (n=18), celecoxib 100 mg twice daily (n=17), or celecoxib 200 mg twice daily (n=15) for 12 weeks. Six additional patients received celecoxib (400 mg twice daily) in an unblinded extension of the study. Biopsies were obtained at baseline and week 12. All patients entering the study were required to have at least one histologically confirmed early (atypical hyperplasia, atypical hyperkeratosis, or mild dysplasia) or advanced (moderate to severe dysplasia) OPL.
RESULTS: Forty-nine patients (46 of 50 randomized and 3 of 6 open label) were evaluable for efficacy analyses. There were no statistically significant differences between the response rates of the randomly assigned arms: placebo, 33.3% (6 of 18); celecoxib 100 mg twice daily, 41.2% (7 of 17); and celecoxib 200 mg twice daily, 20.0% (3 of 15). Two patients responded on celecoxib 400 mg twice daily. Celecoxib was generally well tolerated. Patients with higher baseline COX-2 mRNA levels had an increased risk of disease progression within 3 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Celecoxib at 100 or 200 mg twice daily was ineffective in controlling OPLs in this randomized controlled trial. This result and cardiovascular toxicity results of other (large scale) randomized controlled trials of selective COX-2 inhibitors have discouraged the continued investigation of these agents in oral cancer chemoprevention. Better methods for identifying high-risk patients and more active interventions are needed for future oral cancer chemoprevention trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18381950     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  38 in total

Review 1.  Chemopreventive potential of natural compounds in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Mohammad Aminur Rahman; A R M Ruhul Amin; Dong M Shin
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.900

Review 2.  Chemoprevention of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma through inhibition of NF-κB signaling.

Authors:  Robert Vander Broek; Grace E Snow; Zhong Chen; Carter Van Waes
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 5.337

3.  Upper esophageal and pharyngeal cancers.

Authors:  Jonathan M Bock; Amy B Howell; Nikki Johnston; Laura A Kresty; Daniel Lew
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 4.  Cancer and inflammation: promise for biologic therapy.

Authors:  Sandra Demaria; Eli Pikarsky; Michael Karin; Lisa M Coussens; Yen-Ching Chen; Emad M El-Omar; Giorgio Trinchieri; Steven M Dubinett; Jenny T Mao; Eva Szabo; Arthur Krieg; George J Weiner; Bernard A Fox; George Coukos; Ena Wang; Robert T Abraham; Michele Carbone; Michael T Lotze
Journal:  J Immunother       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.456

Review 5.  Prognostic factors, predictive markers and cancer biology: the triad for successful oral cancer chemoprevention.

Authors:  Jose Augusto Monteiro de Oliveira Novaes; William N William
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.404

6.  Circulating cycloxygenase-2 in patients with tobacco-related intraoral squamous cell carcinoma and evaluation of its peptide inhibitors as potential antitumor agent.

Authors:  Vaishali Kapoor; Abhay K Singh; Sharmistha Dey; Suresh C Sharma; Satya N Das
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 7.  PPARγ in head and neck cancer prevention.

Authors:  Mauricio Burotto; Eva Szabo
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 5.337

8.  Overexpression of cyclooxygenase-2 in rat oral cancers and prevention of oral carcinogenesis in rats by selective and nonselective COX inhibitors.

Authors:  David L McCormick; Jonathan M Phillips; Thomas L Horn; William D Johnson; Vernon E Steele; Ronald A Lubet
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2010-01

9.  Nanoparticles for local drug delivery to the oral mucosa: proof of principle studies.

Authors:  Andrew S Holpuch; Garrett J Hummel; Meng Tong; Garrett A Seghi; Ping Pei; Ping Ma; Russell J Mumper; Susan R Mallery
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 10.  Current and potential inflammation targeted therapies in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Frederick Wang; Pattatheyil Arun; Jay Friedman; Zhong Chen; Carter Van Waes
Journal:  Curr Opin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 5.547

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.