Dan V Mihailescu1, Arthur B Schneider. 1. Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1819 West Polk Street, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Abstract
CONTEXT: The chance that a thyroid nodule is malignant is higher when there is a history of childhood radiation exposure. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine how the size of a thyroid nodule, the number of nodules, and the distribution of nodules influence the risk of cancer in irradiated patients. PATIENTS: From a cohort of 4296 radiation-exposed people, we studied the 1059 that underwent thyroid surgery. DESIGN AND OUTCOMES: We studied the association between the size, number, distribution, and rank order of thyroid nodules and the chance of malignancy. RESULTS: There were 612 malignant nodules in 358 patients and 2037 benign ones in 930 patients. There was no change in the risk that a nodule was malignant with increasing size (odds ratio 0.91/cm, P = 0.11) among the 1709 nodules that were 0.5 cm or greater. A solitary nodule had a similar likelihood of being malignant as a nodule that was one of several (18.8 vs. 17.3%), whereas patients with multiple nodules were more likely to have thyroid cancer than those with solitary nodules [30.7 vs. 18.7%; risk ratio 1.64 (1.27-2.13)]. Aspirating only the largest nodule would have missed 111 of the cancers (42%), whereas aspirating the two largest nodules would have missed 45 of the cases (17%), although none would have been 10 mm or greater. CONCLUSIONS: In radiation-exposed patients, the following conclusions were made: 1) the likelihood that a nodule is malignant is independent of nodule number and size; 2) the likelihood of cancer is increased if more than one nodule is present; 3) evaluating the two largest nodules by fine-needle aspiration would have resulted in a significant number of cases being missed but none with large cancers; and 4) more than half of the patients with thyroid cancer had multifocal tumors.
CONTEXT: The chance that a thyroid nodule is malignant is higher when there is a history of childhood radiation exposure. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine how the size of a thyroid nodule, the number of nodules, and the distribution of nodules influence the risk of cancer in irradiated patients. PATIENTS: From a cohort of 4296 radiation-exposed people, we studied the 1059 that underwent thyroid surgery. DESIGN AND OUTCOMES: We studied the association between the size, number, distribution, and rank order of thyroid nodules and the chance of malignancy. RESULTS: There were 612 malignant nodules in 358 patients and 2037 benign ones in 930 patients. There was no change in the risk that a nodule was malignant with increasing size (odds ratio 0.91/cm, P = 0.11) among the 1709 nodules that were 0.5 cm or greater. A solitary nodule had a similar likelihood of being malignant as a nodule that was one of several (18.8 vs. 17.3%), whereas patients with multiple nodules were more likely to have thyroid cancer than those with solitary nodules [30.7 vs. 18.7%; risk ratio 1.64 (1.27-2.13)]. Aspirating only the largest nodule would have missed 111 of the cancers (42%), whereas aspirating the two largest nodules would have missed 45 of the cases (17%), although none would have been 10 mm or greater. CONCLUSIONS: In radiation-exposed patients, the following conclusions were made: 1) the likelihood that a nodule is malignant is independent of nodule number and size; 2) the likelihood of cancer is increased if more than one nodule is present; 3) evaluating the two largest nodules by fine-needle aspiration would have resulted in a significant number of cases being missed but none with large cancers; and 4) more than half of the patients with thyroid cancer had multifocal tumors.
Authors: Mary C Frates; Carol B Benson; J William Charboneau; Edmund S Cibas; Orlo H Clark; Beverly G Coleman; John J Cronan; Peter M Doubilet; Douglas B Evans; John R Goellner; Ian D Hay; Barbara S Hertzberg; Charles M Intenzo; R Brooke Jeffrey; Jill E Langer; P Reed Larsen; Susan J Mandel; William D Middleton; Carl C Reading; Steven I Sherman; Franklin N Tessler Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: David S Cooper; Gerard M Doherty; Bryan R Haugen; Richard T Kloos; Stephanie L Lee; Susan J Mandel; Ernest L Mazzaferri; Bryan McIver; Steven I Sherman; R Michael Tuttle Journal: Thyroid Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Mary C Frates; Carol B Benson; Peter M Doubilet; Elizabeth Kunreuther; Maricela Contreras; Edmund S Cibas; Joseph Orcutt; Francis D Moore; P Reed Larsen; Ellen Marqusee; Erik K Alexander Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2006-07-11 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Julieta E Barroeta; Hongling Wang; Natsuko Shiina; Prabodh K Gupta; Virginia A Livolsi; Zubair W Baloch Journal: Endocr Pathol Date: 2006 Impact factor: 3.943
Authors: Hossein Gharib; Enrico Papini; Roberto Valcavi; H Jack Baskin; Anna Crescenzi; Massimo E Dottorini; Daniel S Duick; Rinaldo Guglielmi; Carlos Robert Hamilton; Martha A Zeiger; Michele Zini Journal: Endocr Pract Date: 2006 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.443
Authors: Cécile M Ronckers; Alice J Sigurdson; Marilyn Stovall; Susan A Smith; Ann C Mertens; Yan Liu; Sue Hammond; Charles E Land; Joseph P Neglia; Sarah S Donaldson; Anna T Meadows; Charles A Sklar; Leslie L Robison; Peter D Inskip Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 3.372
Authors: Khaled Y Ajarma; Ashraf F Al-Faouri; Maysoon K Al Ruhaibeh; Feras A Almbaidien; Rima T Nserat; Abdallah O Al-Shawabkeh; Khaldon K Al-Sarihin; Yousef A Al-Harazi; Haitham S Rbihat; Mohammad E Aljbour Journal: Med J Armed Forces India Date: 2018-07-03
Authors: Nikola Slijepcevic; Vladan Zivaljevic; Jelena Marinkovic; Sandra Sipetic; Aleksandar Diklic; Ivan Paunovic Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2015-04-30 Impact factor: 4.430