BACKGROUND: Although many studies have investigated the association between anthropometry and ovarian cancer risk, results have been inconsistent. METHODS: The associations of height, body mass index (BMI), and ovarian cancer risk were examined in a pooled analysis of primary data from 12 prospective cohort studies from North America and Europe. The study population consisted of 531,583 women among whom 2,036 epithelial ovarian cancer cases were identified. To summarize associations, study-specific relative risks (RR) were estimated using the Cox proportional hazards model and then combined using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Women with height > or =1.70 m had a pooled multivariate RR of 1.38 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.16-1.65] compared with those with height <1.60 m. For the same comparison, multivariate RRs were 1.79 (95% CI, 1.07-3.00) for premenopausal and 1.25 (95% CI, 1.04-1.49) for postmenopausal ovarian cancer (P(interaction) = 0.14). The multivariate RR for women with a BMI > or =30 kg/m(2) was 1.03 (95% CI, 0.86-1.22) compared with women with a BMI from 18.5 to 23 kg/m(2). For the same comparison, multivariate RRs were 1.72 (95% CI, 1.02-2.89) for premenopausal and 1.07 (95% CI, 0.87-1.33) for postmenopausal women (P(interaction) = 0.07). There was no statistically significant heterogeneity between studies with respect to height or BMI. BMI in early adulthood was not associated with ovarian cancer risk. CONCLUSION: Height was associated with an increased ovarian cancer risk, especially in premenopausal women. BMI was not associated with ovarian cancer risk in postmenopausal women but was positively associated with risk in premenopausal women.
BACKGROUND: Although many studies have investigated the association between anthropometry and ovarian cancer risk, results have been inconsistent. METHODS: The associations of height, body mass index (BMI), and ovarian cancer risk were examined in a pooled analysis of primary data from 12 prospective cohort studies from North America and Europe. The study population consisted of 531,583 women among whom 2,036 epithelial ovarian cancer cases were identified. To summarize associations, study-specific relative risks (RR) were estimated using the Cox proportional hazards model and then combined using a random-effects model. RESULTS:Women with height > or =1.70 m had a pooled multivariate RR of 1.38 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.16-1.65] compared with those with height <1.60 m. For the same comparison, multivariate RRs were 1.79 (95% CI, 1.07-3.00) for premenopausal and 1.25 (95% CI, 1.04-1.49) for postmenopausal ovarian cancer (P(interaction) = 0.14). The multivariate RR for women with a BMI > or =30 kg/m(2) was 1.03 (95% CI, 0.86-1.22) compared with women with a BMI from 18.5 to 23 kg/m(2). For the same comparison, multivariate RRs were 1.72 (95% CI, 1.02-2.89) for premenopausal and 1.07 (95% CI, 0.87-1.33) for postmenopausal women (P(interaction) = 0.07). There was no statistically significant heterogeneity between studies with respect to height or BMI. BMI in early adulthood was not associated with ovarian cancer risk. CONCLUSION: Height was associated with an increased ovarian cancer risk, especially in premenopausal women. BMI was not associated with ovarian cancer risk in postmenopausal women but was positively associated with risk in premenopausal women.
Authors: E V Bandera; J L Freudenheim; J R Marshall; M Zielezny; R L Priore; J Brasure; M Baptiste; S Graham Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 1997-11 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: A Polychronopoulou; A Tzonou; C C Hsieh; G Kaprinis; A Rebelakos; N Toupadaki; D Trichopoulos Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 1993-09-30 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Alison J Canchola; Ellen T Chang; Leslie Bernstein; Joan A Largent; Peggy Reynolds; Dennis Deapen; Katherine D Henderson; Giske Ursin; Pamela L Horn-Ross Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2010-10-06 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: A Goday; I Barneto; J M García-Almeida; A Blasco; A Lecube; C Grávalos; P Martínez de Icaya; R de las Peñas; S Monereo; L Vázquez; J E Palacio; P Pérez-Segura Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2015-06-03 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Patricia G Moorman; Rachel T Palmieri; Lucy Akushevich; Andrew Berchuck; Joellen M Schildkraut Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2009-07-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Wei Zheng; Kim N Danforth; Shelley S Tworoger; Marc T Goodman; Alan A Arslan; Alpa V Patel; Marjorie L McCullough; Stephanie J Weinstein; Laurence N Kolonel; Mark P Purdue; Xiao-Ou Shu; Kirk Snyder; Emily Steplowski; Kala Visvanathan; Kai Yu; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Yu-Tang Gao; Susan E Hankinson; Chinonye Harvey; Richard B Hayes; Brian E Henderson; Ronald L Horst; Kathy J Helzlsouer Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2010-06-18 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Jonathan L Hecht; Joanne Kotsopoulos; Susan E Hankinson; Shelley S Tworoger Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2009-04-21 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Ann K Folkins; Aasia Saleemuddin; Leslie A Garrett; Judy E Garber; Michael G Muto; Shelley S Tworoger; Christopher P Crum Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2009-07-16 Impact factor: 5.482