Literature DB >> 18381356

Ecotoxicological applications and significance of the comet assay.

Awadhesh N Jha1.   

Abstract

Application of the single-cell gel electrophoresis or comet assay has revolutionized the field of genetic ecotoxicology or eco-genotoxicology. It is a rapid, sensitive and relatively inexpensive method providing the opportunity to study DNA damage (including oxidative damage), repair and cell death (apoptosis) in different cell types without prior knowledge of karyotype and cell turnover rate. The assay has, however, often attracted criticism for its lack of ecotoxicological relevance. In addition, in contrast to genetic toxicology where rapid technical progress has been made to improve cell- and tissue-specific adoption of the assay, only limited advancement has been made to transfer the methodologies to ecotoxicological studies. While reviewing the recent information available in the literature and underscoring the importance of induced genetic damage in natural species, the aims of this article are to (i) highlight and judiciously analyse the ecotoxicological relevance of the assay; (ii) attempt to correlate the comet response with other relevant biological responses or biomarkers; (iii) identify the technical challenges and various factors affecting its application in order to make it reliable, reproducible and robust; (iv) critically compare the technical developments in genetic toxicology and genetic ecotoxicology and (v) evaluate the future developments with respect to applications of the assay. It is suggested that while complementing other ecotoxicological parameters and further improving the methodologies, the comet assay will continue to play an important role in genetic ecotoxicology to determine induced genetic damage, which has significant consequences for short- and long-term survival of the natural or wild species. Information obtained through integrated studies using simultaneous applications of multiple biomarkers on different wild organisms could also provide an holistic dimension of toxicological impact of environmental contaminants for the protection of human health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18381356     DOI: 10.1093/mutage/gen014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  58 in total

1.  Fluctuating estuarine conditions are not confounding factors for the Comet assay assessment of DNA damage in the mussel Mytilus edulis.

Authors:  Rupika Singh; Mark G J Hartl
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Proposal to optimize ecotoxicological evaluation of wastewater treated by conventional biological and ozonation processes.

Authors:  Adriana Wigh; Alain Devaux; Vanessa Brosselin; Adriana Gonzalez-Ospina; Bruno Domenjoud; Selim Aït-Aïssa; Nicolas Creusot; Antoine Gosset; Christine Bazin; Sylvie Bony
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Contamination of bivalve haemolymph samples by adductor muscle components: implications for biomarker studies.

Authors:  Sherain N Al-Subiai; Awadhesh N Jha; A John Moody
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2008-12-14       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Monitoring pollution of coastal lagoon using Liza aurata kidney oxidative stress and genetic endpoints: an integrated biomarker approach.

Authors:  M Oliveira; I Ahmad; V L Maria; M Pacheco; M A Santos
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Assessing the environmental genotoxicity risk in the Baltic Sea: frequencies of nuclear buds in blood erythrocytes of three native fish species.

Authors:  Janina Baršienė; Laura Butrimavičienė; Aleksandras Michailovas; Wlodzimierz Grygiel
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Aerial pesticide application causes DNA damage in pilots from Sinaloa, Mexico.

Authors:  C Martínez-Valenzuela; S M Waliszewski; O Amador-Muñoz; E Meza; M E Calderón-Segura; E Zenteno; J Huichapan-Martínez; M Caba; R Félix-Gastélum; R Longoria-Espinoza
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 7.  Practical considerations for conducting ecotoxicity test methods with manufactured nanomaterials: what have we learnt so far?

Authors:  Richard D Handy; Nico van den Brink; Mark Chappell; Martin Mühling; Renata Behra; Maria Dušinská; Peter Simpson; Jukka Ahtiainen; Awadhesh N Jha; Jennifer Seiter; Anthony Bednar; Alan Kennedy; Teresa F Fernandes; Michael Riediker
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  Responses of the European flounder (Platichthys flesus) to a mixture of PAHs and PCBs in experimental conditions.

Authors:  Célie Dupuy; Claire Galland; Alain Devaux; Sylvie Bony; Véronique Loizeau; Morgane Danion; Vianney Pichereau; Michel Fournier; Jean Laroche
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Genotoxic effects of commercial formulations of Chlorpyrifos and Tebuconazole on green algae.

Authors:  Ricardo Santiago Martinez; Walter Darío Di Marzio; María Elena Sáenz
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 2.823

10.  An imazethapyr-based herbicide formulation induces genotoxic, biochemical, and individual organizational effects in Leptodactylus latinasus tadpoles (Anura: Leptodactylidae).

Authors:  Juan M Pérez-Iglesias; Julie C Brodeur; Marcelo L Larramendy
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.