Literature DB >> 18381309

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients who have excessive joint laxity.

Sung-Jae Kim1, Tae-Eun Kim, Doo-Hyung Lee, Kyung-Soo Oh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to compare the clinical results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with use of different grafts in patients with or without excessive joint laxity.
METHODS: We retrospectively studied eighty-three patients (forty-eight men and thirty-five women) who had undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between June 2002 and August 2004. Of the thirty-one patients who had generalized joint laxity, twenty were managed with an autologous bone-patellar tendon-bone graft and eleven were managed with a four-bundle hamstring (semitendinosus-gracilis tendon) graft. Of the fifty-two patients who had normal joint laxity, thirty-three were managed with a bone-patellar tendon-bone graft and nineteen were managed with a hamstring graft. Clinical results were evaluated by means of an examination at a minimum of twenty-four months after surgery.
RESULTS: Among the patients who had normal joint laxity, the mean side-to-side difference in anterior tibial translation on testing with the KT-2000 arthrometer at a minimum of twenty-four months postoperatively was 2.7 +/- 1.9 mm in the bone-patellar tendon-bone graft group and 3.5 +/- 1.7 mm in the hamstring graft group. This difference was not significant. The mean Lysholm score was 91 +/- 7 points in the bone-patellar tendon-bone graft group and 85 +/- 10 points in the hamstring graft group (p = 0.492). The side-to-side difference in anterior translation had an inverse correlation with the Lysholm score (beta = -0.604, p < 0.001). Among the patients who had excessive joint laxity, the mean side-to-side difference in anterior tibial translation was 3.4 +/- 1.5 mm in the bone-patellar tendon-bone graft group and 4.5 +/- 2.0 mm in the hamstring graft group (p = 0.036). The mean Lysholm score was 89 +/- 7 points in the bone-patellar tendon-bone group and 79 +/- 12 points in the hamstring group (p = 0.015). The side-to-side difference in anterior translation had an inverse correlation with the Lysholm score (beta = -0.708, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients who have excessive joint laxity, the two-year outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts are better than those with four-bundle hamstring grafts in terms of both side-to-side anterior laxity and clinical results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18381309     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.01173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  12 in total

1.  Knee hyperextension does not adversely affect dynamic in vivo kinematics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Kanto Nagai; Tom Gale; Elmar Herbst; Yasutaka Tashiro; James J Irrgang; Scott Tashman; Freddie H Fu; William Anderst
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft could be recommended as a superior graft to hamstring autograft for ACL reconstruction in patients with generalized joint laxity: 2- and 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Sung-Jae Kim; Chong Hyuk Choi; Sung-Hwan Kim; Su-Keon Lee; Wonyong Lee; Taeyup Kim; Min Jung
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Anterior and posterior knee laxity in a young adult Korean population.

Authors:  Hong-Chul Lim; Young-Goo Lee; Joon-Ho Wang; Jong-Woong Park; Dong-Hun Suh; Young-Hwan Kim; Ji-Hoon Bae
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Evaluation of the short-term outcomes of anatomic ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft in patients with generalized joint laxity: A retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Nima Hosseinzadeh; Mehdi Mohammadpour; Mehdi Moghtadaei; Hossein Farahini; Ahmad Khazanchin; Shirin Nasiri; Amir Khazanchin
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2022-09-20

Review 5.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients with generalized joint laxity.

Authors:  Sung-Jae Kim; Praveen Kumar; Sung-Hwan Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2010-08-03

6.  Does severity or specific joint laxity influence clinical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?

Authors:  Sung-Jae Kim; Hong-Kyo Moon; Sul-Gee Kim; Yong-Min Chun; Kyung-Soo Oh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Functional outcome of transphyseal reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in skeletally immature patients.

Authors:  Sung-Jae Kim; Dong-Woo Shim; Kwang-Won Park
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2012-09-03

8.  Stability Outcomes following Computer-Assisted ACL Reconstruction.

Authors:  Melissa A Christino; Bryan G Vopat; Alexander Mayer; Andrew P Matson; Steven E Reinert; Robert M Shalvoy
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2015-03-26

9.  Adolescent differences in knee stability following computer-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Melissa A Christino; Bryan G Vopat; Gregory R Waryasz; Alexander Mayer; Steven E Reinert; Robert M Shalvoy
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2014-12-15

10.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome.

Authors:  John Williams; Jonathan Hutt; Mark Rickman
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2015-06-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.