Literature DB >> 18381213

Manually-stimulated recovery of motor function after facial nerve injury requires intact sensory input.

Stoyan P Pavlov1, Maria Grosheva, Michael Streppel, Orlando Guntinas-Lichius, Andrey Irintchev, Emmanouil Skouras, Srebrina K Angelova, Stefanie Kuerten, Nektarios Sinis, Sarah A Dunlop, Doychin N Angelov.   

Abstract

We have recently shown in rat that daily manual stimulation (MS) of vibrissal muscles promotes recovery of whisking and reduces polyinnervation of muscle fibers following repair of the facial nerve (facial-facial anastomosis, FFA). Here, we examined whether these positive effects were: (1) correlated with alterations of the afferent connections of regenerated facial motoneurons, and (2) whether they were achieved by enhanced sensory input through the intact trigeminal nerve. First, we quantified the extent of total synaptic input to motoneurons in the facial nucleus using synaptophysin immunocytochemistry following FFA with and without subsequent MS. We found that, without MS, this input was reduced compared to intact animals. The number of synaptophysin-positive terminals returned to normal values following MS. Thus, MS appears to counteract the deafferentation of regenerated facial motoneurons. Second, we performed FFA and, in addition, eliminated the trigeminal sensory input to facial motoneurons by extirpation of the ipsilateral infraorbital nerve (IONex). In this paradigm, without MS, vibrissal motor performance and pattern of end-plate reinnervation were as aberrant as after FFA without MS. MS did not influence the reinnervation pattern after IONex and functional recovery was even worse than after IONex without MS. Thus, when the sensory system is intact, MS restores normal vibrissal function and reduces the degree of polyinnervation. When afferent inputs are abolished, these effects are eliminated or even reversed. We conclude that rehabilitation strategies must be carefully designed to take into account the extent of motor and/or sensory damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18381213     DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2008.02.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Neurol        ISSN: 0014-4886            Impact factor:   5.330


  11 in total

1.  [Regeneration of the facial nerve in comparison to other peripheral nerves : from bench to bedside].

Authors:  A Irintchev; D N Angelov; O Guntinas-Lichius
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Whisking recovery after automated mechanical stimulation during facial nerve regeneration.

Authors:  Ingrid J Kleiss; Christopher J Knox; Juan S Malo; Henri A M Marres; Tessa A Hadlock; James T Heaton
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.611

3.  Non-invasive stimulation of the vibrissal pad improves recovery of whisking function after simultaneous lesion of the facial and infraorbital nerves in rats.

Authors:  H Bendella; S P Pavlov; M Grosheva; A Irintchev; S K Angelova; D Merkel; N Sinis; K Kaidoglou; E Skouras; S A Dunlop; Doychin N Angelov
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The Musculature That Drives Active Touch by Vibrissae and Nose in Mice.

Authors:  Sebastian Haidarliu; David Kleinfeld; Martin Deschênes; Ehud Ahissar
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 2.064

5.  Rat whisker movement after facial nerve lesion: evidence for autonomic contraction of skeletal muscle.

Authors:  James T Heaton; Shu Hsien Sheu; Marc H Hohman; Christopher J Knox; Julie S Weinberg; Ingrid J Kleiss; Tessa A Hadlock
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  A system for delivering mechanical stimulation and robot-assisted therapy to the rat whisker pad during facial nerve regeneration.

Authors:  James T Heaton; Christopher J Knox; Juan S Malo; James B Kobler; Tessa A Hadlock
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.802

7.  Manual stimulation of the whisker pad after hypoglossal-facial anastomosis (HFA) using a Y-tube conduit does not improve recovery of whisking function.

Authors:  Umut Ozsoy; Bahadir Murat Demirel; Arzu Hizay; Ozlem Ozsoy; Janina Ankerne; Srebrina Angelova; Levent Sarikcioglu; Yasar Ucar; Murat Turhan; Sarah Dunlop; Doychin N Angelov
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Mini review: Biomaterials in repair and regeneration of nerve in a volumetric muscle loss.

Authors:  Neelam Ahuja; Kamal Awad; Sara Peper; Marco Brotto; Venu Varanasi
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 3.197

9.  Early recovery of neuronal functioning in the sensory cortex after nerve reconstruction surgery.

Authors:  Yu-Chen Pei; Yu-Po Cheng; Ji-Lin Chen; Cheng-Hung Lin; Chih-Jen Wen; Jian-Jia Huang
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.406

10.  Autologous olfactory ensheathing cell transplantation in human paraplegia: a 3-year clinical trial.

Authors:  A Mackay-Sim; F Féron; J Cochrane; L Bassingthwaighte; C Bayliss; W Davies; P Fronek; C Gray; G Kerr; P Licina; A Nowitzke; C Perry; P A S Silburn; S Urquhart; T Geraghty
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 13.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.