BACKGROUND: We have shown previously that 17beta-estradiol (E2) increases left ventricular (LV) and cardiomyocyte hypertrophy after myocardial infarction (MI). However, E2 decreases hypertrophy in pressure overload models. We hypothesized that the effect of estrogen on cardiac hypertrophy was dependent on the type of hypertrophic stimulus. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ovariectomized wild-type female mice (n = 192) were given vehicle or E2 treatment followed by coronary ligation (MI), transverse aortic constriction (TAC), or sham operation. Signaling pathway activation was studied at 3, 24, and 48 hours, whereas echocardiography and hemodynamic studies were performed at 14 days. MI induced early but transient activation of p38 and p42/44 MAPK pathways, whereas TAC induced sustained activation of both pathways. E2 had no effect on these pathways, but increased Stat3 activation after MI while decreasing Stat3 activation after TAC. MI caused LV dilation and decreased fractional shortening (FS) that were unaltered by E2. TAC caused LV dilation, reduced FS, and increased LV mass, but in this model, E2 improved these parameters. After MI, E2 led to increases in myocyte cross-sectional area, atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and beta-myosin heavy chain (MHC) gene expression, but E2 diminished TAC-induced increases ANP and beta-MHC gene expression. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that the effects of E2 on LV and myocyte remodeling depend on the nature of the hypertrophic stimulus. The opposing influence of E2 on hypertrophy in these models may, in part, result from differential effects of E2 on Stat3 activation. Further work will be necessary to explore this and other potential mechanisms by which estrogen affects hypertrophy in these models.
BACKGROUND: We have shown previously that 17beta-estradiol (E2) increases left ventricular (LV) and cardiomyocyte hypertrophy after myocardial infarction (MI). However, E2 decreases hypertrophy in pressure overload models. We hypothesized that the effect of estrogen on cardiac hypertrophy was dependent on the type of hypertrophic stimulus. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ovariectomized wild-type female mice (n = 192) were given vehicle or E2 treatment followed by coronary ligation (MI), transverse aortic constriction (TAC), or sham operation. Signaling pathway activation was studied at 3, 24, and 48 hours, whereas echocardiography and hemodynamic studies were performed at 14 days. MI induced early but transient activation of p38 and p42/44 MAPK pathways, whereas TAC induced sustained activation of both pathways. E2 had no effect on these pathways, but increased Stat3 activation after MI while decreasing Stat3 activation after TAC. MI caused LV dilation and decreased fractional shortening (FS) that were unaltered by E2. TAC caused LV dilation, reduced FS, and increased LV mass, but in this model, E2 improved these parameters. After MI, E2 led to increases in myocyte cross-sectional area, atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and beta-myosin heavy chain (MHC) gene expression, but E2 diminished TAC-induced increases ANP and beta-MHC gene expression. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that the effects of E2 on LV and myocyte remodeling depend on the nature of the hypertrophic stimulus. The opposing influence of E2 on hypertrophy in these models may, in part, result from differential effects of E2 on Stat3 activation. Further work will be necessary to explore this and other potential mechanisms by which estrogen affects hypertrophy in these models.
Authors: L C Sharkey; B J Holycross; S Park; L J Shiry; T M Hoepf; S A McCune; M J Radin Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 1999-08 Impact factor: 5.000
Authors: Syed Haq; Heiko Kilter; Ashour Michael; Jingzang Tao; Eileen O'Leary; Xio Ming Sun; Brian Walters; Kausik Bhattacharya; Xin Chen; Lei Cui; Michele Andreucci; Anthony Rosenzweig; J Luis Guerrero; Richard Patten; Ronglih Liao; Jeffery Molkentin; Michael Picard; Joseph V Bonventre; Thomas Force Journal: Nat Med Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: JoAnn E Manson; Judith Hsia; Karen C Johnson; Jacques E Rossouw; Annlouise R Assaf; Norman L Lasser; Maurizio Trevisan; Henry R Black; Susan R Heckbert; Robert Detrano; Ora L Strickland; Nathan D Wong; John R Crouse; Evan Stein; Mary Cushman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-08-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Navin K Kapur; Szuhuei Wilson; Adil A Yunis; Xiaoying Qiao; Emily Mackey; Vikram Paruchuri; Corey Baker; Mark J Aronovitz; S Ananth Karumanchi; Michelle Letarte; David A Kass; Michael E Mendelsohn; Richard H Karas Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-05-16 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Njabulo Ngwenyama; Ane M Salvador; Francisco Velázquez; Tania Nevers; Alexander Levy; Mark Aronovitz; Andrew D Luster; Gordon S Huggins; Pilar Alcaide Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2019-04-04
Authors: Andrea L Portbury; Sarah M Ronnebaum; Makhosazane Zungu; Cam Patterson; Monte S Willis Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2011-11-06 Impact factor: 5.000
Authors: Tania Nevers; Ane M Salvador; Anna Grodecki-Pena; Andrew Knapp; Francisco Velázquez; Mark Aronovitz; Navin K Kapur; Richard H Karas; Robert M Blanton; Pilar Alcaide Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2015-05-28 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Cameron Donaldson; Sarah Eder; Corey Baker; Mark J Aronovitz; Alexandra Dabreo Weiss; Monica Hall-Porter; Feng Wang; Adam Ackerman; Richard H Karas; Jeffery D Molkentin; Richard D Patten Journal: Circ Res Date: 2008-12-12 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Michele L Esposito; Yali Zhang; Xiaoying Qiao; Lara Reyelt; Vikram Paruchuri; Gavin R Schnitzler; Kevin J Morine; Shiva K Annamalai; Courtney Bogins; Peter S Natov; Robert Pedicini; Catalina Breton; Andrew Mullin; Emily E Mackey; Ayan Patel; Ethan Rowin; Iris Z Jaffe; Richard H Karas; Navin K Kapur Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2018-07-31 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Hideyuki Sasaki; Takahiro Nagayama; Robert M Blanton; Kinya Seo; Manling Zhang; Guangshuo Zhu; Dong I Lee; Djahida Bedja; Steven Hsu; Osamu Tsukamoto; Seiji Takashima; Masafumi Kitakaze; Michael E Mendelsohn; Richard H Karas; David A Kass; Eiki Takimoto Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2014-05-16 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Philip G Wong; David W J Armstrong; M Yat Tse; Emily P A Brander; Stephen C Pang Journal: Mol Cell Biochem Date: 2012-11-21 Impact factor: 3.396