Literature DB >> 18380787

Chronic epididymitis: is epididymectomy a valid surgical treatment?

J G Calleary1, Junaid Masood, J T Hill.   

Abstract

Chronic scrotal pain (>or=3 months) is multi-factorial in nature and difficult to treat. Epididymectomy for chronic epididymal pain is rarely performed because of perceived poor outcome. We retrospectively audited our results, when published 'cure' following testicular denervation is 97%. The records of 32 males (35 consecutive epididymectomies) were retrospectively analysed. Thirteen had previous scrotal surgery. Eight (group one) had palpable painful epididymal abnormalities on clinical examination, nine (group two) had ultrasonic abnormalities but no palpable abnormality and 15 (group three) had neither. Pain response was recorded as: cured, improved, recurred or no change/worse. The mean time to operation was 23.83 months (2-121) and follow-up was 15.57 months (1-84). There were no significant aetiological differences between groups. In group one, 87.5% were cured with the remainder improved. Sixty-seven per cent of group two had a satisfactory outcome. Of group three, 20% were cured and a further 33% improved. Prior scrotal surgery, duration of symptoms and age were not predictive of outcome (Kruskal-Wallis) in terms of pain relief. Epididymectomy for structural abnormalities had excellent results. Those with chronic pain, normal examination and ultrasound had at best, a 55% chance of improvement. This group must be counselled about the low risk of success. The identification of the optimal surgical management of this difficult problem requires a multi-national registry study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18380787     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2008.00880.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Androl        ISSN: 0105-6263


  10 in total

Review 1.  Chronic Scrotal Pain.

Authors:  Christopher Wu; Keith Jarvi
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Evaluation and management of chronic scrotal content pain.

Authors:  Laurence A Levine; Michael P Hoeh
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  A comparison of epididymectomy with vasectomy reversal for the surgical treatment of postvasectomy pain syndrome.

Authors:  Joo Yong Lee; Kang Su Cho; Seung Hwan Lee; Hee Ju Cho; Jeong Man Cho; Cheol Young Oh; June Hyun Han; Ki Soo Lee; Tae Hyo Kim; Seung Wook Lee
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Canadian Urological Association best practice report on chronic scrotal pain.

Authors:  Keith A Jarvi; Christopher Wu; J Curtis Nickel; Trustin Domes; John Grantmyre; Armand Zini
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 5.  Orchialgia and the chronic pelvic pain syndrome.

Authors:  Parviz K Kavoussi; Raymond A Costabile
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  What Can We Do for Chronic Scrotal Content Pain?

Authors:  Wei Phin Tan; Laurence A Levine
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.400

7.  Traditional Chinese medicine on treating epididymitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

Authors:  Yi Lei; Jie Yang; Yongqiang Li; Xudong Yu; Sheng Deng; Chaohui Xue; Wei Zheng; Jianwei Shang; Yahui Xue
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  The Application of Scrotoscope-Assisted Minimally Invasive Excision for Epididymal Mass: An Initial Report.

Authors:  Chuying Qin; Jinrui Yang; Ruochen Zhang; Yaojin Yang; Wanghai Cai; Tao Li; Qingguo Zhu; Liefu Ye; Yunliang Gao; Yongbao Wei
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-02-24

Review 9.  An overview of the management of post-vasectomy pain syndrome.

Authors:  Wei Phin Tan; Laurence A Levine
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

10.  The safety and efficacy of acupuncture for epididymitis protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Jisheng Wang; Liang Han; Binghao Bao; Xudong Yu; Kaige Zhang; Hengheng Dai; Xiao Li; Bin Wang; Haisong Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.889

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.