Literature DB >> 18380449

AutoShim: empirically corrected scoring functions for quantitative docking with a crystal structure and IC50 training data.

Eric J Martin1, David C Sullivan.   

Abstract

It has been notoriously difficult to develop general all-purpose scoring functions for high-throughput docking that correlate with measured binding affinity. As a practical alternative, AutoShim uses the program Magnet to add point-pharmacophore like "shims" to the binding site of each protein target. The pharmacophore shims are weighted by partial least-squares (PLS) regression, adjusting the all-purpose scoring function to reproduce IC 50 data, much as the shims in an NMR magnet are weighted to optimize the field for a better spectrum. This dramatically improves the affinity predictions on 25% of the compounds held out at random. An iterative procedure chooses the best pose during the process of shim parametrization. This method reproducibly converges to a consistent solution, regardless of starting pose, in just 2-4 iterations, so these robust models do not overtrain. Sets of complex multifeature shims, generated by a recursive partitioning method, give the best activity predictions, but these are difficult to interpret when designing new compounds. Sets of simpler single-point pharmacophores still predict affinity reasonably well and clearly indicate the molecular interactions producing effective binding. The pharmacophore requirements are very reproducible, irrespective of the compound sets used for parametrization, lending confidence to the predictions and interpretations. The automated procedure does require a training set of experimental compounds but otherwise adds little extra time over conventional docking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18380449     DOI: 10.1021/ci7004548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  10 in total

1.  Robust optimization of scoring functions for a target class.

Authors:  Markus H J Seifert
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Experimental versus predicted affinities for ligand binding to estrogen receptor: iterative selection and rescoring of docked poses systematically improves the correlation.

Authors:  James S Wright; James M Anderson; Hooman Shadnia; Tony Durst; John A Katzenellenbogen
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Hybrid receptor structure/ligand-based docking and activity prediction in ICM: development and evaluation in D3R Grand Challenge 3.

Authors:  Polo C-H Lam; Ruben Abagyan; Maxim Totrov
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Macrocycle modeling in ICM: benchmarking and evaluation in D3R Grand Challenge 4.

Authors:  Polo C-H Lam; Ruben Abagyan; Maxim Totrov
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Structure-Based Target-Specific Screening Leads to Small-Molecule CaMKII Inhibitors.

Authors:  David Xu; Liwei Li; Donghui Zhou; Degang Liu; Andy Hudmon; Samy O Meroueh
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 3.466

6.  A biomedical open knowledge network harnesses the power of AI to understand deep human biology.

Authors:  Sergio E Baranzini; Katy Börner; John Morris; Charlotte A Nelson; Karthik Soman; Erica Schleimer; Michael Keiser; Mark Musen; Roger Pearce; Tahsin Reza; Brett Smith; Bruce W Herr; Boris Oskotsky; Angela Rizk-Jackson; Katherine P Rankin; Stephan J Sanders; Riley Bove; Peter W Rose; Sharat Israni; Sui Huang
Journal:  AI Mag       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 2.524

7.  A knowledge-guided strategy for improving the accuracy of scoring functions in binding affinity prediction.

Authors:  Tiejun Cheng; Zhihai Liu; Renxiao Wang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-04-17       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Cheminformatics aspects of high throughput screening: from robots to models: symposium summary.

Authors:  Y Jane Tseng; Eric Martin; Cristian G Bologa; Anang A Shelat
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Combining docking with pharmacophore filtering for improved virtual screening.

Authors:  Megan L Peach; Marc C Nicklaus
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 5.514

Review 10.  Structure-based virtual screening for drug discovery: a problem-centric review.

Authors:  Tiejun Cheng; Qingliang Li; Zhigang Zhou; Yanli Wang; Stephen H Bryant
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 4.009

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.