Keir J Warner1, Michael K Copass, Eileen M Bulger. 1. Department of Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98104, USA. keirw@u.washington.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The use of prehospital needle thoracostomy (NT) is controversial as it is not without risk. Issues such as inappropriate patient selection, misplacement causing iatrogenic injury, treatment failures in obese patients, and delaying definitive tube thoracostomy in the emergency department contribute to this controversy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate a cohort of patients undergoing NT by paramedics for tension pneumothorax and review the indications for use, complications, and emergency department outcomes of NT. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients undergoing NT in the prehospital setting and transported directly to a Level 1 trauma center over a one-year period. Patients were transported by a single ground transport agency staffed by paramedics. All paramedics were trained to follow uniform protocols for treatment procedures. Variables included indications for NT, patient demographics, prehospital vital signs, injury mechanism, chest X-ray, and Emergency Department outcomes. RESULTS: Paramedics responded to 20,330 advanced life support calls, and 39 (0.2%) patients had a NT placed for treatment of tension pneumothorax. Twenty-two (56.4%) patients were in circulatory arrest, with 12 suffering traumatic arrest and 10 patients in nontraumatic PEA arrest. The remaining 17 (43.6%) patients were treated for nonarrest causes. CONCLUSIONS: The use of NT appears to be a safe procedure when preformed by paramedics in an urban EMS system. Prehospital NT resulted in four cases of unexpected survival.
OBJECTIVE: The use of prehospital needle thoracostomy (NT) is controversial as it is not without risk. Issues such as inappropriatepatient selection, misplacement causing iatrogenic injury, treatment failures in obesepatients, and delaying definitive tube thoracostomy in the emergency department contribute to this controversy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate a cohort of patients undergoing NT by paramedics for tension pneumothorax and review the indications for use, complications, and emergency department outcomes of NT. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients undergoing NT in the prehospital setting and transported directly to a Level 1 trauma center over a one-year period. Patients were transported by a single ground transport agency staffed by paramedics. All paramedics were trained to follow uniform protocols for treatment procedures. Variables included indications for NT, patient demographics, prehospital vital signs, injury mechanism, chest X-ray, and Emergency Department outcomes. RESULTS: Paramedics responded to 20,330 advanced life support calls, and 39 (0.2%) patients had a NT placed for treatment of tension pneumothorax. Twenty-two (56.4%) patients were in circulatory arrest, with 12 suffering traumatic arrest and 10 patients in nontraumatic PEA arrest. The remaining 17 (43.6%) patients were treated for nonarrest causes. CONCLUSIONS: The use of NT appears to be a safe procedure when preformed by paramedics in an urban EMS system. Prehospital NT resulted in four cases of unexpected survival.
Authors: Chad G Ball; Amy D Wyrzykowski; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Christopher J Dente; Jeffrey M Nicholas; Jeffrey P Salomone; Grace S Rozycki; John B Kortbeek; David V Feliciano Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Johnathon M Aho; Cornelius A Thiels; Moustafa M El Khatib; Daniel S Ubl; Danuel V Laan; Kathleen S Berns; Elizabeth B Habermann; Scott P Zietlow; Martin D Zielinski Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Sharven Taghavi; Zoe Maher; Amy J Goldberg; Grace Chang; Michelle Mendiola; Christofer Anderson; Scott Ninokawa; Leah C Tatebe; Patrick Maluso; Shariq Raza; Jane J Keating; Sigrid Burruss; Matthew Reeves; Lauren E Coleman; David V Shatz; Anna Goldenberg-Sandau; Apoorva Bhupathi; M Chance Spalding; Aimee LaRiccia; Emily Bird; Matthew R Noorbakhsh; James Babowice; Marsha C Nelson; Lewis E Jacobson; Jamie Williams; Michael Vella; Kate Dellonte; Thomas Z Hayward; Emma Holler; Mark J Lieser; John D Berne; Dalier R Mederos; Reza Askari; Barbara U Okafor; Elliott R Haut; Eric W Etchill; Raymond Fang; Samantha L Roche; Laura Whittenburg; Andrew C Bernard; James M Haan; Kelly L Lightwine; Scott H Norwood; Jason Murry; Mark A Gamber; Matthew M Carrick; Nikolay Bugaev; Antony Tatar; Juan Duchesne; Danielle Tatum Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Michael M Neeki; Christina Cheung; Fanglong Dong; Nam Pham; Dylan Shafer; Arianna Neeki; Keeyon Hajjafar; Rodney Borger; Brandon Woodward; Louis Tran Journal: Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Date: 2021-08-27
Authors: Rachel Strauss; Isabella Menchetti; Laure Perrier; Erik Blondal; Henry Peng; Wendy Sullivan-Kwantes; Homer Tien; Avery Nathens; Andrew Beckett; Jeannie Callum; Luis Teodoro da Luz Journal: Trauma Surg Acute Care Open Date: 2021-10-19
Authors: Brian Wernick; Heidi H Hon; Ronnie N Mubang; Anthony Cipriano; Ronson Hughes; Demicha D Rankin; David C Evans; William R Burfeind; Brian A Hoey; James Cipolla; Sagar C Galwankar; Thomas J Papadimos; Stanislaw P Stawicki; Michael S Firstenberg Journal: Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci Date: 2015 Jul-Sep