Literature DB >> 18379831

Cost utility analysis of knee prosthesis with complete microprocessor control (C-leg) compared with mechanical technology in trans-femoral amputees.

Simone Gerzeli1, Aleksandra Torbica, Giovanni Fattore.   

Abstract

The study determines the cost-utility of a unilateral electronic knee prosthesis (C-leg) compared to mechanical alternatives in trans-femoral amputees. For each type of prosthesis, 50 patients, treated in a major Italian centre, were enrolled. Quality adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated from responses to EuroQol (EQ-5D). Healthcare and social costs were assessed for the estimated life cycle of the technologies (5 years). C-leg was associated with 0.09 more QALYs per patient per year (P = 0.007). For the 5-year period, the incremental cost-utility ratio of C-leg resulted in euro 35,971 per QALY from the healthcare system perspective. If non-healthcare costs and productivity losses are included, the two groups to have similar costs (euro 66,669 vs euro 66,927).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18379831     DOI: 10.1007/s10198-008-0102-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Health Econ        ISSN: 1618-7598


  8 in total

1.  The Kenevo microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee compared with non-microprocessor-controlled knees in individuals older than 65 years in Sweden: A cost-effectiveness and budget-impact analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Kuhlmann; Kerstin Hagberg; Ilka Kamrad; Nerrolyn Ramstrand; Susanne Seidinger; Hans Berg
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 1.672

2.  OASIS 1: Retrospective analysis of four different microprocessor knee types.

Authors:  James H Campbell; Phillip M Stevens; Shane R Wurdeman
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2020-11-05

3.  Health economic evaluation in orthotics and prosthetics: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Leigh Clarke; Michael Dillon; Alan Shiell
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2019-06-27

4.  Cross-sectional International Multicenter Study on Quality of Life and Reasons for Abandonment of Upper Limb Prostheses.

Authors:  Michiro Yamamoto; Kevin C Chung; Jennifer Sterbenz; Melissa J Shauver; Hirotaka Tanaka; Takashi Nakamura; Jumpei Oba; Takaaki Chin; Hitoshi Hirata
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-05-24

Review 5.  Economic benefits of microprocessor controlled prosthetic knees: a modeling study.

Authors:  Christine Chen; Mark Hanson; Ritika Chaturvedi; Soeren Mattke; Richard Hillestad; Harry H Liu
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 4.262

6.  Prosthetic Knee Selection for Individuals with Unilateral Transfemoral Amputation: A Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Phillip M Stevens; Shane R Wurdeman
Journal:  J Prosthet Orthot       Date:  2018-11-09

7.  Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of the microprocessor-controlled knee C-Leg in transfemoral amputees with and without diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Alexander Kuhlmann; Henning Krüger; Susanne Seidinger; Andreas Hahn
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2020-01-02

Review 8.  A toolkit for prosthetists and orthotists to facilitate progress in professional communication over the next 50 years.

Authors:  Jaap J Van Netten; Gustav Jarl; Klaas Postema; Anita E Williams
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 1.895

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.