Literature DB >> 18379404

Surgical treatment of fixed cervical kyphosis with myelopathy.

Brian A O'Shaughnessy1, John C Liu, Patrick C Hsieh, Tyler R Koski, Aruna Ganju, Stephen L Ondra.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective clinical study.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate clinical and radiographic outcomes following the surgical treatment of fixed cervical kyphosis with myelopathy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: To our knowledge, a study specifically addressing the surgical treatment of fixed cervical sagittal deformity has never before been published.
METHODS: Sixteen patients treated surgically for fixed cervical kyphosis and myelopathy were followed for a mean of 4.5 years (range, 25-112 months). The study group consisted of 9 males and 7 females, with an average age of 52 years (range, 31-78 years). The principal etiologies of cervical deformity were prior laminectomy (63%), advanced spondylosis (19%), infection (6%), neuromuscular disease (6%), and metabolic disease (renal osteodystrophy) (6%). All patients were clinically evaluated by the Nurick classification and Odom criteria both before surgery and at the time of most recent follow-up. Radiographic analysis was performed using thin-cut CT scans, dynamic radiographs, and 14 x 36-inch scoliosis films.
RESULTS: The mean preoperative cervical Cobb angle as measured from the C2-C7 was +38 degrees and improved to -10 degrees at final follow-up, yielding an average correction of 48 degrees . The mean number of anterior and posterior segments fused was 4.8 (range, 2-6) and 7.2 (range, 3-14), respectively. The mean Nurick score improved from 2.4 before surgery to 1.5 at the time of follow-up. According to Odom criteria, outcomes were as follows: excellent (38%), good (50%), fair (6%), and poor (6%). At the time of most recent follow-up, solid bony arthrodesis and maintenance of correction occurred in all patients; however, revision was required in one patient.
CONCLUSION: The treatment of fixed cervical kyphosis with myelopathy using circumferential spinal osteotomies and instrumented reconstruction is technically demanding; however, restoration and maintenance of a neutral or lordotic cervical profile and excellent clinical outcomes are achievable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18379404     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181695082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  26 in total

1.  The stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior and combined techniques for the reconstruction of a 2-level cervical corpectomy model: biomechanical study and first results of ATPS prototyping.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Rene Schmidt; Michael Mayer; Wolfgang Hitzl; Juliane Zenner; Stefan Midderhoff; Stefan Middendorf; Nicolaus Graf; Nicolaus Gräf; H Resch; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Hans-Joachim Willke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  C5 nerve palsy after posterior reconstruction surgery: predictive risk factors of the incidence and critical range of correction for kyphosis.

Authors:  Takuto Kurakawa; Hiroshi Miyamoto; Shuichi Kaneyama; Masatoshi Sumi; Koki Uno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Correlation between the clinic and the index of cervical myelopathy Torg.

Authors:  Agnaldo Rogério Lozorio; Mateus Borges; José Lucas Batista Junior; Charbel Chacob Junior; Igor Cardoso Machado; Rodrigo Rezende
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 0.513

4.  Construct stability of an instrumented 2-level cervical corpectomy model following fatigue testing: biomechanical comparison of circumferential antero-posterior instrumentation versus a novel anterior-only transpedicular screw-plate fixation technique.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Werner Schmoelz; Juliane Zenner; Alexander Auffarth; Herbert Resch; Wolfgang Hitzl; Davud Malekzadeh; Lukas Ernstbrunner; Martina Blocher; Michael Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Adult cervical deformity: radiographic and osteotomy classifications.

Authors:  Bassel G Diebo; Neil V Shah; Maximillian Solow; Vincent Challier; Carl B Paulino; Peter G Passias; Renaud Lafage; Frank J Schwab; Han Jo Kim; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 6.  [Intraoperative neuromonitoring in cervical deformity surgery].

Authors:  E Shiban; B Meyer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Clinical outcomes of anterior correction and reconstruction for neurofibromatosis-associated severe cervical kyphotic deformity.

Authors:  Gu Yifei; Shen Xiaolong; Liu Yang; Cao Peng; Yuan Wen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Cervical Spine Under-Represents Sagittal Plane Deformity in Degenerative Myelopathy Patients.

Authors:  Douglas S Weinberg; Arunit J Chugh; Jeremy J Gebhart; Jason D Eubanks
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-09-07

9.  Characteristics of deformity surgery in patients with severe and rigid cervical kyphosis (CK): results of the CSRS-Europe multi-centre study project.

Authors:  H Koller; C Ames; H Mehdian; R Bartels; R Ferch; V Deriven; H Toyone; C Shaffrey; J Smith; W Hitzl; J Schröder; Yohan Robinson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  In vitro study of accuracy of cervical pedicle screw insertion using an electronic conductivity device (ATPS part III).

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Wolfgang Hitzl; Frank Acosta; Mark Tauber; Juliane Zenner; Herbert Resch; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Oliver Meier; Rene Schmidt; Michael Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.