OBJECTIVE: To describe the epidemiology of infections in intensive care units (ICUs), whether present at admission or acquired during the stay. METHODS: Prospective data collection lasting 6 months in 71 Italian adult ICUs. Patients were screened for infections and risk factors at ICU admission and daily during their stay. MAIN RESULTS: Out of 9,493 consecutive patients admitted to the 71 ICUs, 11.6% had a community-acquired infection, 7.4% a hospital-acquired infection, and 11.4% an ICU-acquired infection. The risk curve of acquiring infection in the ICU was higher in patients who entered without infection than in those already infected (log-rank test, p < .0001; at 15 days, 44.0% vs. 34.6%). Hospital mortality (27.8% overall) was higher in patients admitted with infection than in those who acquired infection in the ICU (45.0% vs. 32.4%, p < .0001). Although the presence of infection per se did not influence mortality, the conditions of severe sepsis and septic shock were strong prognostic factors (odds ratio, 2.3 and 4.8, respectively). Apart from ICU-acquired peritonitis, no other site of infection reached statistical significance as an independent prognostic factor for hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Adding specific data on infections and risk factors to a well-established electronic data collection system is a reliable basis for a continuous multicenter infection surveillance program in the ICU. Given the well-established importance of infection prevention programs, our data suggest that the improvement of the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock is the key to lower infection-related mortality in the ICU. This calls for closer attention to severe infections in surveillance programs.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the epidemiology of infections in intensive care units (ICUs), whether present at admission or acquired during the stay. METHODS: Prospective data collection lasting 6 months in 71 Italian adult ICUs. Patients were screened for infections and risk factors at ICU admission and daily during their stay. MAIN RESULTS: Out of 9,493 consecutive patients admitted to the 71 ICUs, 11.6% had a community-acquired infection, 7.4% a hospital-acquired infection, and 11.4% an ICU-acquired infection. The risk curve of acquiring infection in the ICU was higher in patients who entered without infection than in those already infected (log-rank test, p < .0001; at 15 days, 44.0% vs. 34.6%). Hospital mortality (27.8% overall) was higher in patients admitted with infection than in those who acquired infection in the ICU (45.0% vs. 32.4%, p < .0001). Although the presence of infection per se did not influence mortality, the conditions of severe sepsis and septic shock were strong prognostic factors (odds ratio, 2.3 and 4.8, respectively). Apart from ICU-acquired peritonitis, no other site of infection reached statistical significance as an independent prognostic factor for hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Adding specific data on infections and risk factors to a well-established electronic data collection system is a reliable basis for a continuous multicenter infection surveillance program in the ICU. Given the well-established importance of infection prevention programs, our data suggest that the improvement of the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock is the key to lower infection-related mortality in the ICU. This calls for closer attention to severe infections in surveillance programs.
Authors: A Gikas; M Roumbelaki; D Bagatzouni-Pieridou; M Alexandrou; V Zinieri; I Dimitriadis; E I Kritsotakis Journal: Infection Date: 2010-03-12 Impact factor: 3.553
Authors: Elena Volakli; Claudia Spies; Argyris Michalopoulos; A B Johan Groeneveld; Yasser Sakr; Jean-Louis Vincent Journal: Crit Care Date: 2010-03-15 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Guido Bertolini; Giovanni Nattino; Carlo Tascini; Daniele Poole; Bruno Viaggi; Greta Carrara; Carlotta Rossi; Daniele Crespi; Matteo Mondini; Martin Langer; Gian Maria Rossolini; Paolo Malacarne Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2018-09-25 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Robby Markwart; Hiroki Saito; Thomas Harder; Sara Tomczyk; Alessandro Cassini; Carolin Fleischmann-Struzek; Felix Reichert; Tim Eckmanns; Benedetta Allegranzi Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2020-06-26 Impact factor: 17.440