OBJECTIVES: To study the frequency of different gene mutations in patients with early-onset parkinsonism and bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) and the short- and long-term surgical outcome in mutation-positive (MUT+) and -negative (MUT-) patients. METHODS: Eighty patients with disease onset at age <or= 45 years and bilateral STN-DBS were screened for mutations in the Parkin gene and PINK1 gene and for the recurrent p.G2019S mutation in the LRRK2 gene. The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and Hoehn and Yahr (H-Y) scale were used to compare the on- and off-medication conditions preoperatively and in the off-medication/on-stimulation condition postoperatively. RESULTS: We identified 12 mutation carriers (11 Parkin [6 with 2 mutated alleles, 5 with 1 mutated allele], 1 homozygous PINK1). There were no clinical differences between the MUT- and MUT+ patients preoperatively, except for more severe H-Y stage and postural and gait scores in the on-medication state in the MUT+ group. During the first year after surgery, MUT- patients showed better clinical improvement (56% motor UPDRS improvement) compared with MUT+ patients (36%). However, in the long-term follow-up (3-6 years), both groups presented with the same degree of clinical improvement (MUT-: 44% vs MUT+: 42%). Although the MUT+ group showed more severe axial signs preoperatively, MUT- patients developed levodopa- and deep brain stimulation-resistant axial signs within the first 3 to 6 years postoperatively, which diminished the initial benefit soon after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with Parkin or PINK1 mutations benefit from subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation. However, the clinical response is not superior to non-mutation carriers and might be limited by more advanced axial motor symptoms at a relatively early disease stage.
OBJECTIVES: To study the frequency of different gene mutations in patients with early-onset parkinsonism and bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) and the short- and long-term surgical outcome in mutation-positive (MUT+) and -negative (MUT-) patients. METHODS: Eighty patients with disease onset at age <or= 45 years and bilateral STN-DBS were screened for mutations in the Parkin gene and PINK1 gene and for the recurrent p.G2019S mutation in the LRRK2 gene. The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and Hoehn and Yahr (H-Y) scale were used to compare the on- and off-medication conditions preoperatively and in the off-medication/on-stimulation condition postoperatively. RESULTS: We identified 12 mutation carriers (11 Parkin [6 with 2 mutated alleles, 5 with 1 mutated allele], 1 homozygous PINK1). There were no clinical differences between the MUT- and MUT+ patients preoperatively, except for more severe H-Y stage and postural and gait scores in the on-medication state in the MUT+ group. During the first year after surgery, MUT- patients showed better clinical improvement (56% motor UPDRS improvement) compared with MUT+ patients (36%). However, in the long-term follow-up (3-6 years), both groups presented with the same degree of clinical improvement (MUT-: 44% vs MUT+: 42%). Although the MUT+ group showed more severe axial signs preoperatively, MUT- patients developed levodopa- and deep brain stimulation-resistant axial signs within the first 3 to 6 years postoperatively, which diminished the initial benefit soon after surgery. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with Parkin or PINK1 mutations benefit from subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation. However, the clinical response is not superior to non-mutation carriers and might be limited by more advanced axial motor symptoms at a relatively early disease stage.
Authors: Sorin Breit; T Wächter; D Schmid-Bielenberg; D Weiss; P Leitner; T Nägele; D Freudenstein; T Gasser; R Krüger Journal: J Neurol Date: 2010-02-23 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Elise Caccappolo; Roy N Alcalay; Helen Mejia-Santana; Ming-X Tang; Brian Rakitin; Llency Rosado; Elan D Louis; Cynthia L Comella; Amy Colcher; Danna Jennings; Martha A Nance; Susan Bressman; William K Scott; Caroline M Tanner; Susan F Mickel; Howard F Andrews; Cheryl Waters; Stanley Fahn; Lucien J Cote; Steven Frucht; Blair Ford; Michael Rezak; Kevin Novak; Joseph H Friedman; Ronald F Pfeiffer; Laura Marsh; Brad Hiner; Andrew D Siderowf; Barbara M Ross; Miguel Verbitsky; Sergey Kisselev; Ruth Ottman; Lorraine N Clark; Karen S Marder Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2010-11-24 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: C Perandones; N Aráoz Olivos; G B Raina; L A Pellene; J C Giugni; D S Calvo; M Radrizzani; F Piedimonte; F E Micheli Journal: J Neurol Date: 2014-11-20 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Matthew F DiFrancesco; Casey H Halpern; Howard H Hurtig; Gordon H Baltuch; Gregory G Heuer Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2012-07-25 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Rejko Krüger; Rüdiger Hilker; Christian Winkler; Michael Lorrain; Matthias Hahne; Christoph Redecker; Paul Lingor; Wolfgang H Jost Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 2015-07-03 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Tohru Kitada; Julianna J Tomlinson; Hei Sio Ao; David A Grimes; Michael G Schlossmacher Journal: Curr Treat Options Neurol Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: Jeff M Bronstein; Michele Tagliati; Ron L Alterman; Andres M Lozano; Jens Volkmann; Alessandro Stefani; Fay B Horak; Michael S Okun; Kelly D Foote; Paul Krack; Rajesh Pahwa; Jaimie M Henderson; Marwan I Hariz; Roy A Bakay; Ali Rezai; William J Marks; Elena Moro; Jerrold L Vitek; Frances M Weaver; Robert E Gross; Mahlon R DeLong Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2010-10-11